EEMMF
Price
$0.68
Change
-$0.06 (-8.11%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
58.66M
NILIF
Price
$0.34
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
60.55M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EEMMF vs NILIF

Header iconEEMMF vs NILIF Comparison
Open Charts EEMMF vs NILIFBanner chart's image
E3 LITHIUM
Price$0.68
Change-$0.06 (-8.11%)
Volume$41.7K
Capitalization58.66M
Surge Battery Metals
Price$0.34
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$246.74K
Capitalization60.55M
EEMMF vs NILIF Comparison Chart in %
EEMMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NILIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EEMMF vs. NILIF commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMMF is a Hold and NILIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (EEMMF: $0.68 vs. NILIF: $0.34)
Brand notoriety: EEMMF and NILIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EEMMF: 122% vs. NILIF: 103%
Market capitalization -- EEMMF: $58.66M vs. NILIF: $60.55M
EEMMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $58.66M. NILIF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $60.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EEMMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNILIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EEMMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NILIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EEMMF and NILIF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EEMMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NILIF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EEMMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NILIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NILIF is a better buy in the short-term than EEMMF.

Price Growth

EEMMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -18.84% price change this week, while NILIF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +34.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +253.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.05% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NILIF($60.6M) and EEMMF($58.7M) have the same market capitalization . NILIF YTD gains are higher at: 33.192 vs. EEMMF (5.541). NILIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -6.16M vs. EEMMF (-9.6M). EEMMF has more cash in the bank: 7.39M vs. NILIF (2.55M). EEMMF (0) and NILIF (0) have equivalent revenues.
EEMMFNILIFEEMMF / NILIF
Capitalization58.7M60.6M97%
EBITDA-9.6M-6.16M156%
Gain YTD5.54133.19217%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash7.39M2.55M290%
Total Debt836KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EEMMF vs NILIF: Fundamental Ratings
EEMMF
NILIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5024
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8876
SMR RATING
1..100
9698
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6436
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EEMMF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is in the same range as NILIF (54). This means that EEMMF’s stock grew similarly to NILIF’s over the last 12 months.

NILIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as EEMMF (88). This means that NILIF’s stock grew similarly to EEMMF’s over the last 12 months.

EEMMF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as NILIF (98). This means that EEMMF’s stock grew similarly to NILIF’s over the last 12 months.

NILIF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as EEMMF (64). This means that NILIF’s stock grew similarly to EEMMF’s over the last 12 months.

NILIF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as EEMMF (100). This means that NILIF’s stock grew similarly to EEMMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EEMMFNILIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EEMMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NILIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CKHUY6.530.04
+0.67%
CK Hutchison Holdings LTD
BYYLF0.40N/A
N/A
Balyo SA
AMBBY16.31N/A
N/A
Ambu A/S
NGRRF56.31-1.38
-2.40%
Nagarro SE
AMLM0.07N/A
-4.20%
American Lithium Minerals, Inc.

EEMMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EEMMF and NILIF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EEMMF and NILIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EEMMF
1D Price
Change %
EEMMF100%
-7.48%
NILIF - EEMMF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
ATUSF - EEMMF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
BHP - EEMMF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.23%
LAC - EEMMF
25%
Poorly correlated
-8.12%
BDNNY - EEMMF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
More

NILIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NILIF and LAC have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NILIF and LAC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NILIF
1D Price
Change %
NILIF100%
+0.86%
LAC - NILIF
33%
Poorly correlated
-8.12%
BDNNY - NILIF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
PMETF - NILIF
32%
Poorly correlated
-5.92%
SGML - NILIF
32%
Poorly correlated
-8.41%
VALE - NILIF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
More