EEMMF
Price
$1.10
Change
+$0.05 (+4.76%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
80.1M
FWEDF
Price
$2.24
Change
+$0.09 (+4.19%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
468.44M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EEMMF vs FWEDF

Header iconEEMMF vs FWEDF Comparison
Open Charts EEMMF vs FWEDFBanner chart's image
E3 LITHIUM
Price$1.10
Change+$0.05 (+4.76%)
Volume$50.02K
Capitalization80.1M
Fireweed Metals
Price$2.24
Change+$0.09 (+4.19%)
Volume$57.66K
Capitalization468.44M
EEMMF vs FWEDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EEMMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FWEDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EEMMF vs. FWEDF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMMF is a StrongBuy and FWEDF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (EEMMF: $1.10 vs. FWEDF: $2.24)
Brand notoriety: EEMMF and FWEDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EEMMF: 267% vs. FWEDF: 183%
Market capitalization -- EEMMF: $80.1M vs. FWEDF: $468.44M
EEMMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $80.1M. FWEDF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $468.44M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EEMMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFWEDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EEMMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FWEDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FWEDF is a better buy in the long-term than EEMMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EEMMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FWEDF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EEMMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FWEDF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FWEDF is a better buy in the short-term than EEMMF.

Price Growth

EEMMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +17.18% price change this week, while FWEDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +4.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWEDF($468M) has a higher market cap than EEMMF($80.1M). FWEDF YTD gains are higher at: 131.031 vs. EEMMF (70.728). EEMMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -9.6M vs. FWEDF (-34.74M). FWEDF has more cash in the bank: 63.6M vs. EEMMF (7.39M). FWEDF has less debt than EEMMF: FWEDF (181K) vs EEMMF (836K). EEMMF (0) and FWEDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
EEMMFFWEDFEEMMF / FWEDF
Capitalization80.1M468M17%
EBITDA-9.6M-34.74M28%
Gain YTD70.728131.03154%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash7.39M63.6M12%
Total Debt836K181K462%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EEMMF vs FWEDF: Fundamental Ratings
EEMMF
FWEDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8111
SMR RATING
1..100
9698
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3837
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5022

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EEMMF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is in the same range as FWEDF (63). This means that EEMMF’s stock grew similarly to FWEDF’s over the last 12 months.

FWEDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EEMMF (81). This means that FWEDF’s stock grew significantly faster than EEMMF’s over the last 12 months.

EEMMF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as FWEDF (98). This means that EEMMF’s stock grew similarly to FWEDF’s over the last 12 months.

FWEDF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as EEMMF (38). This means that FWEDF’s stock grew similarly to EEMMF’s over the last 12 months.

FWEDF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as EEMMF (100). This means that FWEDF’s stock grew similarly to EEMMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EEMMFFWEDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EEMMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FWEDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WISGX22.520.30
+1.35%
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap GrInstl
KNGIX11.660.10
+0.87%
Vest S&P500 Div Aristocrats Trgt Inc Ins
HBMCX22.500.19
+0.85%
Hartford MidCap HLS IB
TWVLX8.460.07
+0.83%
American Century Value Inv
LCEYX19.690.14
+0.72%
Invesco Diversified Dividend Y

EEMMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EEMMF and NILIF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EEMMF and NILIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EEMMF
1D Price
Change %
EEMMF100%
+4.76%
NILIF - EEMMF
28%
Poorly correlated
-4.22%
IVPAF - EEMMF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.63%
BDNNY - EEMMF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
GLCNF - EEMMF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.71%
ATUSF - EEMMF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
More

FWEDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FWEDF and IVPAF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FWEDF and IVPAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FWEDF
1D Price
Change %
FWEDF100%
+4.28%
IVPAF - FWEDF
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.63%
EEMMF - FWEDF
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.76%
NILIF - FWEDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.22%
AGXPF - FWEDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-8.68%
IPOAF - FWEDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.43%
More