Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMCX vs RNWHX
EEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EEMCX vs RNWHX
Columbia Emerging Markets C
Price$16.10
Change+$1.02 (+6.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets809.62M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.53
Change+$2.43 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
EEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMCX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. EEMCX (810M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EEMCX: RNWHX (1.25) vs EEMCX (0.00). EEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EEMCX (18 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). EEMCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EEMCX: RNWHX (250) vs EEMCX (2000). EEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.75 vs. RNWHX (27.68). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.69 vs. EEMCX (-13.86).
| EEMCX | RNWHX | EEMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 0.72 | 296% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 0.72 | 325% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.882 | 6.092 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 810M | 75.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.25 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.75 | 27.68 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.36 | 43.24 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.86 | 11.69 | -119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.11 | 124.21 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers