Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMCX vs RNWFX
EEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts EEMCX vs RNWFX
Columbia Emerging Markets C
Price$14.88
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets762.47M
American Funds New World R5
Price$96.16
Change-$0.10 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.73B
EEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMCX vs. RNWFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMCX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 74.7B vs. EEMCX (762M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than EEMCX: RNWFX (0.97) vs EEMCX (0.29). EEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: EEMCX (18 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). EEMCX (2.29) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). EEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EEMCX: RNWFX (250) vs EEMCX (2000). EEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.60 vs. RNWFX (15.54). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 29.72 vs. EEMCX (0.45).
| EEMCX | RNWFX | EEMCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.18 | 0.62 | 352% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 0.62 | 369% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.209 | 24.463 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 762M | 74.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.97 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.60 | 15.54 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.91 | 57.71 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.45 | 29.72 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.68 | 94.93 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement