Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMCX vs RNWFX
EEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts EEMCX vs RNWFX
Columbia Emerging Markets C
Price$16.10
Change+$1.02 (+6.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets809.62M
American Funds New World R5
Price$99.24
Change+$2.53 (+2.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
EEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMCX vs. RNWFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMCX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. EEMCX (810M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than EEMCX: RNWFX (1.31) vs EEMCX (0.00). EEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: EEMCX (18 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). EEMCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). EEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EEMCX: RNWFX (250) vs EEMCX (2000). EEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.75 vs. RNWFX (27.90). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.39 vs. EEMCX (-13.86).
| EEMCX | RNWFX | EEMCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 0.62 | 344% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 0.62 | 377% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.882 | 6.094 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 810M | 75.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.31 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.75 | 27.90 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.36 | 43.85 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.86 | 12.39 | -112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.11 | 127.30 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers