Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMCX vs RNWEX
EEMCX vs RNWEX Comparison
Open Charts EEMCX vs RNWEX
Columbia Emerging Markets C
Price$16.10
Change+$1.02 (+6.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets809.62M
American Funds New World R4
Price$98.16
Change+$2.62 (+2.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
EEMCX vs RNWEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMCX vs. RNWEX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMCX is a Buy and RNWEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWEX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. EEMCX (810M). RNWEX pays higher dividends than EEMCX: RNWEX (1.06) vs EEMCX (0.00). EEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWEX: EEMCX (18 years) vs RNWEX (23 years). EEMCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than RNWEX (0.92). EEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RNWEX (46.00). RNWEX has a lower initial minimum investment than EEMCX: RNWEX (250) vs EEMCX (2000). EEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.75 vs. RNWEX (27.46). RNWEX return over 5 years is better than : 10.91 vs. EEMCX (-13.86).
| EEMCX | RNWEX | EEMCX / RNWEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 0.92 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 0.92 | 254% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.882 | 6.073 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 810M | 75.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.75 | 27.46 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.36 | 42.44 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.86 | 10.91 | -127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.11 | 123.66 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers