Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMCX vs RNWBX
EEMCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EEMCX vs RNWBX
Columbia Emerging Markets C
Price$16.10
Change+$1.02 (+6.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets809.62M
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
EEMCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMCX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. EEMCX (810M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than EEMCX: RNWBX (0.45) vs EEMCX (0.00). EEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EEMCX (18 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). EEMCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.66). EEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EEMCX: RNWBX (250) vs EEMCX (2000). EEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.75 vs. RNWBX (26.27). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.03 vs. EEMCX (-13.86).
| EEMCX | RNWBX | EEMCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 1.66 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 1.66 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.882 | 5.996 | 181% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 810M | 75.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.45 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.75 | 26.27 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.36 | 38.81 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.86 | 7.03 | -197% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.11 | 114.19 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers