Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMAX vs RNWFX
EEMAX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts EEMAX vs RNWFX
Columbia Emerging Markets A
Price$16.41
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets761.83M
American Funds New World R5
Price$96.16
Change-$0.10 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.73B
EEMAX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMAX vs. RNWFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMAX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 74.7B vs. EEMAX (762M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than EEMAX: RNWFX (0.97) vs EEMAX (0.85). EEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: EEMAX (18 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). EEMAX (1.54) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). EEMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EEMAX: RNWFX (250) vs EEMAX (2000). EEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.46 vs. RNWFX (15.54). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 29.72 vs. EEMAX (3.85).
| EEMAX | RNWFX | EEMAX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.62 | 231% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.62 | 248% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.914 | 24.463 | 110% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 762M | 74.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.97 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.46 | 15.54 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.37 | 57.71 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.85 | 29.72 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.62 | 94.93 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement