Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMAX vs RNWBX
EEMAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EEMAX vs RNWBX
Columbia Emerging Markets A
Price$16.63
Change-$0.15 (-0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets765.62M
American Funds New World R2
Price$92.33
Change-$1.19 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.61B
EEMAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMAX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 76.6B vs. EEMAX (766M). EEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EEMAX (0.82) vs RNWBX (0.12). EEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EEMAX (18 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than EEMAX (1.54). EEMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EEMAX: RNWBX (250) vs EEMAX (2000). EEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.47 vs. RNWBX (19.74). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 19.82 vs. EEMAX (-0.89).
| EEMAX | RNWBX | EEMAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.67 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.67 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.616 | 25.534 | 112% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 766M | 76.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.12 | 701% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.47 | 19.74 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.30 | 45.78 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.89 | 19.82 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.18 | 89.72 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement