Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMA vs GMF
EEMA vs GMF Comparison
Open Charts EEMA vs GMF
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Price$99.38
Change-$1.64 (-1.62%)
Volume$100
Net Assets1.69B
State Street® SPDR® S&P® Em AsiaPac ETF
Price$142.74
Change-$1.60 (-1.11%)
Volume$100
Net Assets391.68M
EEMA vs GMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMA vs. GMF commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMA is a Hold and GMF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEMA has more net assets: 1.69B vs. GMF (392M). EEMA has a higher annual dividend yield than GMF: EEMA (7.445) vs GMF (4.014). EEMA was incepted earlier than GMF: EEMA (14 years) vs GMF (19 years). EEMA (0.49) and GMF (0.49) have comparable expense ratios . EEMA has a higher turnover GMF (6.00) vs GMF (6.00).
| EEMA | GMF | EEMA / GMF | |
| Gain YTD | 7.445 | 4.014 | 185% |
| Net Assets | 1.69B | 392M | 432% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.49 | 100% |
| Turnover | 17.00 | 6.00 | 283% |
| Yield | 1.38 | 1.43 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEMA | GMF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 9 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 6 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
EEMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEMA has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEMA jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMA | 100% | +0.18% | ||
| BABA - EEMA | 79% Closely correlated | -2.81% | ||
| KC - EEMA | 72% Closely correlated | -3.67% | ||
| BILI - EEMA | 71% Closely correlated | -4.21% | ||
| JD - EEMA | 70% Closely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| BIDU - EEMA | 67% Closely correlated | -2.50% | ||
More | ||||
GMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMF has been closely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GMF jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMF | 100% | -0.52% | ||
| BZ - GMF | 67% Closely correlated | -3.19% | ||
| TSM - GMF | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| ATHM - GMF | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.33% | ||
| JD - GMF | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| BIDU - GMF | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.50% | ||
More | ||||