Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMA vs FPA
EEMA vs FPA Comparison
Open Charts EEMA vs FPA
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Price$82.67
Change-$0.33 (-0.40%)
Volume$45.3K
Net Assets1.35B
First Trust AsiaPac ex-Jpn AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$34.91
Change-$0.95 (-2.65%)
Volume$2.97K
Net Assets22.84M
EEMA vs FPA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMA vs. FPA commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMA is a Hold and FPA is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEMA has more net assets: 1.35B vs. FPA (22.8M). FPA has a higher annual dividend yield than EEMA: FPA (29.483) vs EEMA (15.646). EEMA was incepted earlier than FPA: EEMA (13 years) vs FPA (14 years). EEMA (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than FPA (0.80). FPA has a higher turnover EEMA (7.00) vs EEMA (7.00).
| EEMA | FPA | EEMA / FPA | |
| Gain YTD | 15.646 | 29.483 | 53% |
| Net Assets | 1.35B | 22.8M | 5,917% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.80 | 61% |
| Turnover | 7.00 | 75.00 | 9% |
| Yield | 1.62 | 3.15 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEMA | FPA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EEMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEMA has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EEMA jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMA | 100% | -0.40% | ||
| BZ - EEMA | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.84% | ||
| BEKE - EEMA | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| QFIN - EEMA | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| ATHM - EEMA | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| IQ - EEMA | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
More | ||||
FPA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FPA has been loosely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FPA jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y