Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMA vs FPA
EEMA vs FPA Comparison
Open Charts EEMA vs FPA
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Price$93.70
Change+$0.02 (+0.02%)
Volume$200
Net Assets1.55B
First Trust AsiaPac ex-Jpn AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$37.60
Change-$0.14 (-0.37%)
Volume$4.13K
Net Assets22.48M
EEMA vs FPA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMA vs. FPA commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMA is a Hold and FPA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEMA has more net assets: 1.55B vs. FPA (22.5M). FPA has a higher annual dividend yield than EEMA: FPA (40.809) vs EEMA (31.043). EEMA was incepted earlier than FPA: EEMA (14 years) vs FPA (15 years). EEMA (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than FPA (0.80). FPA has a higher turnover EEMA (7.00) vs EEMA (7.00).
| EEMA | FPA | EEMA / FPA | |
| Gain YTD | 31.043 | 40.809 | 76% |
| Net Assets | 1.55B | 22.5M | 6,893% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.80 | 61% |
| Turnover | 7.00 | 75.00 | 9% |
| Yield | 1.30 | 2.81 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEMA | FPA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 78% | 22 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EEMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEMA has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEMA jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMA | 100% | +0.75% | ||
| BABA - EEMA | 79% Closely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| KC - EEMA | 72% Closely correlated | -2.04% | ||
| BILI - EEMA | 71% Closely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| JD - EEMA | 70% Closely correlated | -1.21% | ||
| BIDU - EEMA | 67% Closely correlated | -0.57% | ||
More | ||||
FPA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FPA has been loosely correlated with BLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FPA jumps, then BLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y