Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMA vs FLAX
EEMA vs FLAX Comparison
Open Charts EEMA vs FLAX
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Price$83.30
Change+$0.29 (+0.35%)
Volume$34.93K
Net Assets1.36B
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
Price$26.22
Change+$0.10 (+0.38%)
Volume$2.08K
Net Assets31.58M
EEMA vs FLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMA vs. FLAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMA is a Buy and FLAX is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEMA has more net assets: 1.36B vs. FLAX (31.6M). FLAX (16.175) and EEMA (16.121) have matching annual dividend yield . EEMA was incepted earlier than FLAX: EEMA (13 years) vs FLAX (7 years). FLAX (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than EEMA (0.49). FLAX has a higher turnover EEMA (7.00) vs EEMA (7.00).
| EEMA | FLAX | EEMA / FLAX | |
| Gain YTD | 16.121 | 16.175 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 1.36B | 31.6M | 4,297% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.19 | 258% |
| Turnover | 7.00 | 23.97 | 29% |
| Yield | 1.44 | 1.98 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEMA | FLAX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 77% | 5 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 79% | 8 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EEMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEMA has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EEMA jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMA | 100% | N/A | ||
| BZ - EEMA | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| BEKE - EEMA | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| ATHM - EEMA | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| QFIN - EEMA | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| IQ - EEMA | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.71% | ||
More | ||||
FLAX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLAX has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLAX jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLAX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLAX | 100% | +0.40% | ||
| BZ - FLAX | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| BEKE - FLAX | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| QFIN - FLAX | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| YMM - FLAX | 59% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| IQ - FLAX | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.71% | ||
More | ||||