Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMA vs FLAX
EEMA vs FLAX Comparison
Open Charts EEMA vs FLAX
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Price$93.73
Change+$0.05 (+0.05%)
Volume$20.9K
Net Assets1.56B
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
Price$29.49
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
Volume$1.75K
Net Assets34.94M
EEMA vs FLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMA vs. FLAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMA is a Hold and FLAX is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEMA has more net assets: 1.56B vs. FLAX (34.9M). EEMA (31.117) and FLAX (30.620) have matching annual dividend yield . EEMA was incepted earlier than FLAX: EEMA (14 years) vs FLAX (8 years). FLAX (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than EEMA (0.49). EEMA has a higher turnover FLAX (4.50) vs FLAX (4.50).
| EEMA | FLAX | EEMA / FLAX | |
| Gain YTD | 31.117 | 30.620 | 102% |
| Net Assets | 1.56B | 34.9M | 4,467% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.19 | 258% |
| Turnover | 7.00 | 4.50 | 156% |
| Yield | 1.30 | 1.79 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEMA | FLAX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 78% | 10 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TVRFX | 77.87 | 0.44 | +0.57% |
| Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Core R3 | |||
| RWMGX | 66.86 | 0.28 | +0.42% |
| American Funds Washington Mutual R6 | |||
| TRWAX | 25.06 | 0.06 | +0.24% |
| Transamerica International Equity A | |||
| DRESX | 26.28 | -0.18 | -0.68% |
| Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Gr | |||
| GISYX | 17.56 | -0.16 | -0.90% |
| Grandeur Peak Intl Stalwarts Instl | |||
EEMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEMA has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEMA jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMA | 100% | +0.06% | ||
| BABA - EEMA | 79% Closely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| KC - EEMA | 72% Closely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| BILI - EEMA | 71% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| JD - EEMA | 70% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| BIDU - EEMA | 67% Closely correlated | -0.73% | ||
More | ||||
FLAX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FLAX and ACGP have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLAX and ACGP's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLAX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLAX | 100% | +0.08% | ||
| ACGP - FLAX | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.09% | ||
| WB - FLAX | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
| TUYA - FLAX | 15% Poorly correlated | -1.72% | ||
| DQ - FLAX | 14% Poorly correlated | -1.94% | ||
| VIPS - FLAX | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.05% | ||
More | ||||