Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMA vs FLAX
EEMA vs FLAX Comparison
Open Charts EEMA vs FLAX
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Price$90.45
Change-$0.68 (-0.75%)
Volume$38.39K
Net Assets1.49B
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
Price$28.49
Change-$0.17 (-0.59%)
Volume$5.89K
Net Assets34.03M
EEMA vs FLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMA vs. FLAX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMA is a Hold and FLAX is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEMA has more net assets: 1.49B vs. FLAX (34M). EEMA (26.526) and FLAX (26.211) have matching annual dividend yield . EEMA was incepted earlier than FLAX: EEMA (14 years) vs FLAX (8 years). FLAX (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than EEMA (0.49). EEMA has a higher turnover FLAX (4.50) vs FLAX (4.50).
| EEMA | FLAX | EEMA / FLAX | |
| Gain YTD | 26.526 | 26.211 | 101% |
| Net Assets | 1.49B | 34M | 4,374% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.19 | 258% |
| Turnover | 7.00 | 4.50 | 156% |
| Yield | 1.39 | 1.90 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEMA | FLAX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 81% | 12 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EEMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEMA has been closely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEMA jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMA | 100% | -0.75% | ||
| BZ - EEMA | 68% Closely correlated | -2.13% | ||
| ATHM - EEMA | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| PDD - EEMA | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| HTHT - EEMA | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| IQ - EEMA | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.23% | ||
More | ||||
FLAX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FLAX and TUYA have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLAX and TUYA's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLAX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLAX | 100% | -0.60% | ||
| TUYA - FLAX | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.19% | ||
| VIPS - FLAX | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.38% | ||
| BEKE - FLAX | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.52% | ||
| WB - FLAX | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.48% | ||
| BZ - FLAX | 8% Poorly correlated | -2.13% | ||
More | ||||