Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMA vs FLAX
EEMA vs FLAX Comparison
Open Charts EEMA vs FLAX
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Price$85.69
Change+$0.21 (+0.25%)
Volume$27.99K
Net Assets1.42B
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
Price$27.16
Change+$0.06 (+0.22%)
Volume$2.77K
Net Assets32.75M
EEMA vs FLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMA vs. FLAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMA is a Hold and FLAX is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEMA has more net assets: 1.42B vs. FLAX (32.8M). FLAX (20.302) and EEMA (19.871) have matching annual dividend yield . EEMA was incepted earlier than FLAX: EEMA (14 years) vs FLAX (8 years). FLAX (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than EEMA (0.49). EEMA has a higher turnover FLAX (4.50) vs FLAX (4.50).
| EEMA | FLAX | EEMA / FLAX | |
| Gain YTD | 19.871 | 20.302 | 98% |
| Net Assets | 1.42B | 32.8M | 4,323% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.19 | 258% |
| Turnover | 7.00 | 4.50 | 156% |
| Yield | 1.41 | 1.93 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEMA | FLAX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 7 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EEMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEMA has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EEMA jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMA | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| BZ - EEMA | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| ATHM - EEMA | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| HTHT - EEMA | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| IQ - EEMA | 58% Loosely correlated | +4.19% | ||
| BEKE - EEMA | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.33% | ||
More | ||||
FLAX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FLAX and AC have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLAX and AC's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLAX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLAX | 100% | +0.21% | ||
| AC - FLAX | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.38% | ||
| PDD - FLAX | 13% Poorly correlated | +3.67% | ||
| LU - FLAX | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.40% | ||
| TAL - FLAX | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.42% | ||
| QFIN - FLAX | 11% Poorly correlated | -4.05% | ||
More | ||||