Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEM vs MEM
EEM vs MEM Comparison
Open Charts EEM vs MEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Price$58.62
Change-$0.98 (-1.64%)
Volume$41.21K
Net Assets27.36B
Matthews Emerging Markets Eq Actv ETF
Price$38.56
Change-$0.77 (-1.96%)
Volume$142
Net Assets47.35M
EEM vs MEM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEM vs. MEM commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEM is a Hold and MEM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEM has more net assets: 27.4B vs. MEM (47.3M). MEM has a higher annual dividend yield than EEM: MEM (9.849) vs EEM (8.938). EEM was incepted earlier than MEM: EEM (23 years) vs MEM (4 years). EEM (0.72) has a lower expense ratio than MEM (0.79). MEM has a higher turnover EEM (8.00) vs EEM (8.00).
| EEM | MEM | EEM / MEM | |
| Gain YTD | 8.938 | 9.849 | 91% |
| Net Assets | 27.4B | 47.3M | 57,928% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.79 | 91% |
| Turnover | 8.00 | 209.01 | 4% |
| Yield | 2.05 | 3.25 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEM | MEM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
EEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEM has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEM jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEM | 100% | +0.54% | ||
| BABA - EEM | 76% Closely correlated | -2.81% | ||
| JD - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| KC - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | -3.67% | ||
| BILI - EEM | 69% Closely correlated | -4.21% | ||
| BIDU - EEM | 67% Closely correlated | -2.50% | ||
More | ||||
MEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MEM has been loosely correlated with HTHT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MEM jumps, then HTHT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEM | 100% | +0.48% | ||
| HTHT - MEM | 40% Loosely correlated | +2.27% | ||
| WDS - MEM | 37% Loosely correlated | +3.31% | ||
| VINP - MEM | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| LRCX - MEM | 34% Loosely correlated | -3.12% | ||
| PRU - MEM | 33% Loosely correlated | -4.06% | ||
More | ||||