Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEM vs FTHF
EEM vs FTHF Comparison
Open Charts EEM vs FTHF
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Price$54.35
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
Volume$176.46K
Net Assets20.64B
FT EM Human Flourishing ETF
Price$32.09
Change+$0.20 (+0.63%)
Volume$300
Net Assets50.97M
EEM vs FTHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEM vs. FTHF commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEM is a Buy and FTHF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEM has more net assets: 20.6B vs. FTHF (51M). FTHF has a higher annual dividend yield than EEM: FTHF (53.490) vs EEM (31.195). EEM was incepted earlier than FTHF: EEM (23 years) vs FTHF (2 years). EEM (0.72) and FTHF (0.75) have comparable expense ratios . FTHF has a higher turnover EEM (13.00) vs EEM (13.00).
| EEM | FTHF | EEM / FTHF | |
| Gain YTD | 31.195 | 53.490 | 58% |
| Net Assets | 20.6B | 51M | 40,392% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.75 | 96% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 30.00 | 43% |
| Yield | 2.18 | 2.29 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEM | FTHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 81% | 15 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
EEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEM has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEM jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEM | 100% | +0.07% | ||
| BABA - EEM | 76% Closely correlated | -1.89% | ||
| JD - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| KC - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| BILI - EEM | 69% Closely correlated | -2.36% | ||
| BIDU - EEM | 67% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
More | ||||
FTHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FTHF and OUT have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTHF and OUT's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTHF | 100% | +0.03% | ||
| OUT - FTHF | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
| SLM - FTHF | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.07% | ||
| SM - FTHF | 22% Poorly correlated | +3.48% | ||
| CLS - FTHF | 16% Poorly correlated | +1.35% | ||
| ABG - FTHF | 16% Poorly correlated | +2.49% | ||
More | ||||