Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEM vs FTHF
EEM vs FTHF Comparison
Open Charts EEM vs FTHF
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Price$49.41
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
Volume$175.82K
Net Assets18.69B
FT EM Human Flourishing ETF
Price$26.80
Change-$0.03 (-0.11%)
Volume$100
Net Assets46.77M
EEM vs FTHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEM vs. FTHF commentary
Jul 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEM is a Buy and FTHF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEM has more net assets: 18.7B vs. FTHF (46.8M). FTHF has a higher annual dividend yield than EEM: FTHF (28.244) vs EEM (19.269). EEM was incepted earlier than FTHF: EEM (22 years) vs FTHF (2 years). EEM (0.72) and FTHF (0.75) have comparable expense ratios . FTHF has a higher turnover EEM (13.00) vs EEM (13.00).
| EEM | FTHF | EEM / FTHF | |
| Gain YTD | 19.269 | 28.244 | 68% |
| Net Assets | 18.7B | 46.8M | 39,957% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.75 | 96% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 30.00 | 43% |
| Yield | 2.45 | 2.76 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEM | FTHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEM has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EEM jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEM | 100% | +0.65% | ||
| BZ - EEM | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| QFIN - EEM | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| ATHM - EEM | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.54% | ||
| IQ - EEM | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| BEKE - EEM | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.95% | ||
More | ||||
FTHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTHF has been loosely correlated with OUT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTHF jumps, then OUT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTHF | 100% | -11.75% | ||
| OUT - FTHF | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| SLM - FTHF | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
| ABG - FTHF | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.79% | ||
| SM - FTHF | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.66% | ||
| CLS - FTHF | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.81% | ||
More | ||||