Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEM vs FTHF
EEM vs FTHF Comparison
Open Charts EEM vs FTHF
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Price$50.46
Change+$0.61 (+1.22%)
Volume$404.75K
Net Assets18.97B
FT EM Human Flourishing ETF
Price$27.56
Change+$0.24 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.98M
EEM vs FTHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEM vs. FTHF commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEM is a Hold and FTHF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEM has more net assets: 19B vs. FTHF (49M). FTHF has a higher annual dividend yield than EEM: FTHF (30.614) vs EEM (20.355). EEM was incepted earlier than FTHF: EEM (22 years) vs FTHF (2 years). EEM (0.72) and FTHF (0.75) have comparable expense ratios . FTHF has a higher turnover EEM (13.00) vs EEM (13.00).
| EEM | FTHF | EEM / FTHF | |
| Gain YTD | 20.355 | 30.614 | 66% |
| Net Assets | 19B | 49M | 38,776% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.75 | 96% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 30.00 | 43% |
| Yield | 2.37 | 2.70 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEM | FTHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 83% | 29 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEM has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EEM jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEM | 100% | -0.32% | ||
| BZ - EEM | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| ATHM - EEM | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| IQ - EEM | 60% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| HTHT - EEM | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| PDD - EEM | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
More | ||||
FTHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTHF has been loosely correlated with OUT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTHF jumps, then OUT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| OUT - FTHF | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| SLM - FTHF | 23% Poorly correlated | +3.35% | ||
| ABG - FTHF | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.10% | ||
| SM - FTHF | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.47% | ||
| CLS - FTHF | 20% Poorly correlated | +4.47% | ||
More | ||||