Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEM vs FDEM
EEM vs FDEM Comparison
Open Charts EEM vs FDEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Price$48.76
Change+$0.22 (+0.45%)
Volume$20.08M
Net Assets18.54B
Fidelity Emerging Markets Mltfct ETF
Price$28.20
Change-$0.06 (-0.21%)
Volume$124.9K
Net Assets191.92M
EEM vs FDEM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEM vs. FDEM commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEM is a Hold and FDEM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEM has more net assets: 18.5B vs. FDEM (192M). EEM has a higher annual dividend yield than FDEM: EEM (17.723) vs FDEM (13.850). EEM was incepted earlier than FDEM: EEM (22 years) vs FDEM (6 years). FDEM (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than EEM (0.72). FDEM has a higher turnover EEM (13.00) vs EEM (13.00).
| EEM | FDEM | EEM / FDEM | |
| Gain YTD | 17.723 | 13.850 | 128% |
| Net Assets | 18.5B | 192M | 9,635% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.25 | 288% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 65.00 | 20% |
| Yield | 2.45 | 3.77 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEM | FDEM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 83% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEM has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EEM jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEM | 100% | +0.45% | ||
| BZ - EEM | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| ATHM - EEM | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| QFIN - EEM | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| IQ - EEM | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.71% | ||
| BEKE - EEM | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
More | ||||
FDEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDEM has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDEM jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDEM | 100% | -0.21% | ||
| QFIN - FDEM | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| YUMC - FDEM | 19% Poorly correlated | -0.41% | ||
| VIPS - FDEM | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.53% | ||
| OMAB - FDEM | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.56% | ||
| ATHM - FDEM | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.64% | ||
More | ||||