Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEM vs FDEM
EEM vs FDEM Comparison
Open Charts EEM vs FDEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Price$59.60
Change+$5.67 (+10.51%)
Volume$41.13M
Net Assets27.36B
Fidelity Emerging Markets Mltfct ETF
Price$33.59
Change+$3.29 (+10.86%)
Volume$153.14K
Net Assets449.56M
EEM vs FDEM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEM vs. FDEM commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEM is a Hold and FDEM is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEM has more net assets: 27.4B vs. FDEM (450M). EEM (8.938) and FDEM (8.776) have matching annual dividend yield . EEM was incepted earlier than FDEM: EEM (23 years) vs FDEM (7 years). FDEM (0.27) has a lower expense ratio than EEM (0.72). FDEM has a higher turnover EEM (8.00) vs EEM (8.00).
| EEM | FDEM | EEM / FDEM | |
| Gain YTD | 8.938 | 8.776 | 102% |
| Net Assets | 27.4B | 450M | 6,089% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.27 | 267% |
| Turnover | 8.00 | 76.00 | 11% |
| Yield | 2.05 | 2.98 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEM | FDEM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 8 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
EEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEM has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEM jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEM | 100% | +0.54% | ||
| BABA - EEM | 76% Closely correlated | -2.81% | ||
| JD - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| KC - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | -3.67% | ||
| BILI - EEM | 69% Closely correlated | -4.21% | ||
| BIDU - EEM | 67% Closely correlated | -2.50% | ||
More | ||||
FDEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDEM has been loosely correlated with ATHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDEM jumps, then ATHM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDEM | 100% | +0.87% | ||
| ATHM - FDEM | 59% Loosely correlated | -3.33% | ||
| PDD - FDEM | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| QFIN - FDEM | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.96% | ||
| VIPS - FDEM | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| YUMC - FDEM | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
More | ||||