Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEM vs FDEM
EEM vs FDEM Comparison
Open Charts EEM vs FDEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Price$49.94
Change+$0.06 (+0.12%)
Volume$24.04M
Net Assets19.06B
Fidelity Emerging Markets Mltfct ETF
Price$29.08
Change-$0.11 (-0.38%)
Volume$32.47K
Net Assets231.71M
EEM vs FDEM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEM vs. FDEM commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEM is a Hold and FDEM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEM has more net assets: 19.1B vs. FDEM (232M). EEM has a higher annual dividend yield than FDEM: EEM (20.427) vs FDEM (17.847). EEM was incepted earlier than FDEM: EEM (22 years) vs FDEM (6 years). FDEM (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than EEM (0.72). FDEM has a higher turnover EEM (13.00) vs EEM (13.00).
| EEM | FDEM | EEM / FDEM | |
| Gain YTD | 20.427 | 17.847 | 114% |
| Net Assets | 19.1B | 232M | 8,233% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.25 | 288% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 65.00 | 20% |
| Yield | 2.42 | 3.69 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEM | FDEM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 17 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEM has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EEM jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEM | 100% | -1.23% | ||
| BZ - EEM | 62% Loosely correlated | -4.99% | ||
| ATHM - EEM | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.50% | ||
| HTHT - EEM | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.10% | ||
| IQ - EEM | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.05% | ||
| QFIN - EEM | 57% Loosely correlated | -4.48% | ||
More | ||||
FDEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDEM has been loosely correlated with ATHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDEM jumps, then ATHM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDEM | 100% | -0.51% | ||
| ATHM - FDEM | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.50% | ||
| QFIN - FDEM | 52% Loosely correlated | -4.48% | ||
| PDD - FDEM | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| YUMC - FDEM | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.73% | ||
| VIPS - FDEM | 45% Loosely correlated | +5.93% | ||
More | ||||