Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEM vs EMXF
EEM vs EMXF Comparison
Open Charts EEM vs EMXF
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Price$50.92
Change+$0.47 (+0.93%)
Volume$132.91K
Net Assets19.15B
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF
Price$44.05
Change+$0.19 (+0.43%)
Volume$100
Net Assets108.75M
EEM vs EMXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEM vs. EMXF commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEM is a Hold and EMXF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEM has more net assets: 19.1B vs. EMXF (109M). EEM has a higher annual dividend yield than EMXF: EEM (21.804) vs EMXF (19.219). EEM was incepted earlier than EMXF: EEM (22 years) vs EMXF (5 years). EMXF (0.17) has a lower expense ratio than EEM (0.72). EMXF has a higher turnover EEM (13.00) vs EEM (13.00).
| EEM | EMXF | EEM / EMXF | |
| Gain YTD | 21.804 | 19.219 | 113% |
| Net Assets | 19.1B | 109M | 17,523% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.17 | 424% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 27.00 | 48% |
| Yield | 2.37 | 3.04 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEM | EMXF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 83% | 22 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 7 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEM has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EEM jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEM | 100% | +1.20% | ||
| BZ - EEM | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| ATHM - EEM | 64% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| IQ - EEM | 60% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| HTHT - EEM | 60% Loosely correlated | +3.33% | ||
| PDD - EEM | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.65% | ||
More | ||||
EMXF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EMXF and AC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMXF and AC's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMXF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMXF | 100% | +1.10% | ||
| AC - EMXF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TAL - EMXF | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.07% | ||
| BAP - EMXF | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
| XP - EMXF | 6% Poorly correlated | +5.64% | ||
| LTM - EMXF | 6% Poorly correlated | -2.08% | ||
More | ||||