Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEM vs EMIF
EEM vs EMIF Comparison
Open Charts EEM vs EMIF
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Price$49.94
Change+$0.06 (+0.12%)
Volume$24.04M
Net Assets19.06B
iShares Emerging Markets Infras ETF
Price$24.97
Change-$0.11 (-0.44%)
Volume$338
Net Assets7.52M
EEM vs EMIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEM vs. EMIF commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEM is a Hold and EMIF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEM has more net assets: 19.1B vs. EMIF (7.52M). EMIF has a higher annual dividend yield than EEM: EMIF (22.432) vs EEM (20.572). EEM was incepted earlier than EMIF: EEM (22 years) vs EMIF (16 years). EMIF (0.60) has a lower expense ratio than EEM (0.72). EMIF has a higher turnover EEM (13.00) vs EEM (13.00).
| EEM | EMIF | EEM / EMIF | |
| Gain YTD | 20.572 | 22.432 | 92% |
| Net Assets | 19.1B | 7.52M | 253,888% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.60 | 120% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 17.00 | 76% |
| Yield | 2.42 | 4.07 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEM | EMIF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 10 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 7 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEM has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EEM jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEM | 100% | +0.12% | ||
| BZ - EEM | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| ATHM - EEM | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| HTHT - EEM | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| IQ - EEM | 59% Loosely correlated | +4.19% | ||
| YUMC - EEM | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
More | ||||
EMIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMIF has been loosely correlated with PAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMIF jumps, then PAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMIF | 100% | -0.46% | ||
| PAC - EMIF | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.04% | ||
| SBS - EMIF | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| ASR - EMIF | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.49% | ||
| ELP - EMIF | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.11% | ||
| UGP - EMIF | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.92% | ||
More | ||||