Advertisement
EEIQ vs SCTBY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEIQ is a Buy and SCTBY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EEIQ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSCTBY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- EEIQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SCTBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EEIQ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCTBY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EEIQ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- SCTBY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
EEIQ (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а -13.90% price change this week, while SCTBY (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was -0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.38%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.37%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Consumer Specialties (-0.49% weekly)‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.
@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-2.32% weekly)The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
| EEIQ | SCTBY | EEIQ / SCTBY | |
| Capitalization | 9.7M | 8.45B | 0% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 12.6B | - |
| Gain YTD | -59.933 | 24.392 | -246% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 14.90 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 160B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 6.82B | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 44.3B | - |
SCTBY | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 24 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 37 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| EEIQ | SCTBY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 40% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 40% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 31% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 32% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 31% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 23% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 33% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 45% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MAGY | 56.61 | 0.09 | +0.16% |
| Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF | |||
| RMIF | 25.09 | 0.03 | +0.12% |
| LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF | |||
| IPO | 49.75 | 0.06 | +0.12% |
| Renaissance IPO ETF | |||
| BSCX | 21.43 | 0.02 | +0.09% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corp Bd ETF | |||
| SPEM | 46.26 | -0.14 | -0.30% |
| SPDR® Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | |||
EEIQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EEIQ and SUGP have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EEIQ and SUGP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEIQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEIQ | 100% | +1.63% | ||
| SUGP - EEIQ | 29% Poorly correlated | -8.38% | ||
| KICK - EEIQ | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BSEFY - EEIQ | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WAFU - EEIQ | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.10% | ||
| CBZ - EEIQ | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.73% | ||
More | ||||
SCTBY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SCTBY and IPSOF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCTBY and IPSOF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCTBY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCTBY | 100% | N/A | ||
| IPSOF - SCTBY | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| INPOY - SCTBY | 10% Poorly correlated | -2.55% | ||
| FA - SCTBY | 3% Poorly correlated | +3.29% | ||
| EUBG - SCTBY | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EEIQ - SCTBY | 1% Poorly correlated | +1.63% | ||
More | ||||