EEIQ
Price
$0.52
Change
-$0.02 (-3.70%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
12.11M
SCTBY
Price
$16.00
Change
+$0.49 (+3.16%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
8.83B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EEIQ vs SCTBY

Header iconEEIQ vs SCTBY Comparison
Open Charts EEIQ vs SCTBYBanner chart's image
EpicQuest Education Group International
Price$0.52
Change-$0.02 (-3.70%)
Volume$762.61K
Capitalization12.11M
Securitas A B
Price$16.00
Change+$0.49 (+3.16%)
Volume$700
Capitalization8.83B
EEIQ vs SCTBY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EEIQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCTBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EEIQ vs. SCTBY commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEIQ is a Hold and SCTBY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (EEIQ: $0.52 vs. SCTBY: $16.00)
Brand notoriety: EEIQ and SCTBY are both not notable
EEIQ represents the Other Consumer Specialties, while SCTBY is part of the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EEIQ: 14% vs. SCTBY: 75%
Market capitalization -- EEIQ: $12.11M vs. SCTBY: $8.83B
EEIQ [@Other Consumer Specialties] is valued at $12.11M. SCTBY’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $8.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $8.45B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $42.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $1.18B. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $4.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EEIQ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSCTBY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EEIQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SCTBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCTBY is a better buy in the long-term than EEIQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EEIQ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCTBY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EEIQ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SCTBY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCTBY is a better buy in the short-term than EEIQ.

Price Growth

EEIQ (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а -1.08% price change this week, while SCTBY (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +1.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.28%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +3.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Specialties (+1.02% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+3.97% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCTBY($8.83B) has a higher market cap than EEIQ($12.1M). SCTBY YTD gains are higher at: 28.820 vs. EEIQ (-50.000).
EEIQSCTBYEEIQ / SCTBY
Capitalization12.1M8.83B0%
EBITDAN/A12.6B-
Gain YTD-50.00028.820-173%
P/E RatioN/A15.47-
RevenueN/A160B-
Total CashN/A6.82B-
Total DebtN/A44.3B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SCTBY: Fundamental Ratings
SCTBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
54
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
38

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EEIQSCTBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EEIQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCTBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ICUI131.245.61
+4.47%
ICU Medical
LYTS23.290.04
+0.17%
LSI Industries
DOV177.75-0.61
-0.34%
Dover Corp
BRN1.14-0.01
-0.87%
Barnwell Industries
DHX2.97-0.04
-1.33%
DHI Group

EEIQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EEIQ and SUGP have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EEIQ and SUGP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EEIQ
1D Price
Change %
EEIQ100%
-4.04%
SUGP - EEIQ
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
KICK - EEIQ
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BSEFY - EEIQ
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WAFU - EEIQ
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
CBZ - EEIQ
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
More

SCTBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCTBY and IPSOF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCTBY and IPSOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCTBY
1D Price
Change %
SCTBY100%
N/A
IPSOF - SCTBY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INPOY - SCTBY
10%
Poorly correlated
+10.93%
FA - SCTBY
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
EUBG - SCTBY
1%
Poorly correlated
-16.26%
EEIQ - SCTBY
1%
Poorly correlated
-4.04%
More