Advertisement
EEFT vs RPAY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEFT is a Hold and RPAY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EEFT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRPAY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- EEFT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- RPAY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EEFT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RPAY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EEFT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- RPAY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
EEFT (@Computer Communications) experienced а -1.85% price change this week, while RPAY (@Computer Communications) price change was -2.27% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -6.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.73%.
Reported Earning Dates
EEFT is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.
RPAY is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-6.88% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| EEFT | RPAY | EEFT / RPAY | |
| Capitalization | 2.98B | 281M | 1,061% |
| EBITDA | 658M | -17.55M | -3,750% |
| Gain YTD | -6.740 | -5.753 | 117% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.37 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 4.18B | 309M | 1,354% |
| Total Cash | 2.02B | 95.7M | 2,112% |
| Total Debt | 2.46B | 437M | 563% |
EEFT | RPAY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 55 Fair valued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 40 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 85 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 70 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EEFT's Valuation (55) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as RPAY (86) in the null industry. This means that EEFT’s stock grew similarly to RPAY’s over the last 12 months.
EEFT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as RPAY (100) in the null industry. This means that EEFT’s stock grew similarly to RPAY’s over the last 12 months.
EEFT's SMR Rating (40) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RPAY (95) in the null industry. This means that EEFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than RPAY’s over the last 12 months.
EEFT's Price Growth Rating (80) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as RPAY (85) in the null industry. This means that EEFT’s stock grew similarly to RPAY’s over the last 12 months.
RPAY's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as EEFT (80) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that RPAY’s stock grew similarly to EEFT’s over the last 12 months.
| EEFT | RPAY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 63% | 8 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 11 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 82% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MRIMX | 25.84 | 0.31 | +1.21% |
| Victory Integrity Mid-Cap Value R6 | |||
| TRQZX | 98.69 | 0.43 | +0.44% |
| T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z | |||
| HFYRX | 14.69 | 0.05 | +0.34% |
| Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val R3 | |||
| REIZX | 15.30 | 0.05 | +0.33% |
| Third Avenue International RE Val Z | |||
| CCCNX | 7.06 | 0.01 | +0.14% |
| Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Foc I | |||
EEFT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEFT has been closely correlated with ACIW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEFT jumps, then ACIW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEFT | 100% | +4.81% | ||
| ACIW - EEFT | 71% Closely correlated | +3.67% | ||
| GEN - EEFT | 71% Closely correlated | +2.14% | ||
| PSFE - EEFT | 68% Closely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| DOX - EEFT | 68% Closely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| OSPN - EEFT | 67% Closely correlated | -0.80% | ||
More | ||||
RPAY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RPAY has been closely correlated with PSFE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RPAY jumps, then PSFE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RPAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPAY | 100% | +2.08% | ||
| PSFE - RPAY | 70% Closely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| RPD - RPAY | 67% Closely correlated | +3.56% | ||
| EEFT - RPAY | 63% Loosely correlated | +4.81% | ||
| WIX - RPAY | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.36% | ||
| BLZE - RPAY | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.41% | ||
More | ||||