EEFT vs MCCX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEFT is a Hold and MCCX is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EEFT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMCCX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- EEFT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MCCX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EEFT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- EEFT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
EEFT (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.27% price change this week, while MCCX (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.96%.
Reported Earning Dates
EEFT is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+0.05% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| EEFT | MCCX | EEFT / MCCX | |
| Capitalization | 4.97B | 225K | 2,210,222% |
| EBITDA | 589M | -362.97K | -162,271% |
| Gain YTD | 0.690 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 19.75 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.69B | 60.2K | 6,126,246% |
| Total Cash | 1.78B | 3.18K | 55,890,669% |
| Total Debt | 2.01B | 20K | 10,065,000% |
EEFT | MCCX | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 32 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 54 Fair valued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 68 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EEFT's Valuation (54) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as MCCX (84) in the null industry. This means that EEFT’s stock grew similarly to MCCX’s over the last 12 months.
EEFT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as MCCX (100) in the null industry. This means that EEFT’s stock grew similarly to MCCX’s over the last 12 months.
EEFT's SMR Rating (38) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCCX (98) in the null industry. This means that EEFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCCX’s over the last 12 months.
EEFT's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as MCCX (68) in the null industry. This means that EEFT’s stock grew similarly to MCCX’s over the last 12 months.
EEFT's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as MCCX (100) in the null industry. This means that EEFT’s stock grew similarly to MCCX’s over the last 12 months.
| EEFT | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 0% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% |
EEFT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEFT has been loosely correlated with ALRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EEFT jumps, then ALRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEFT | 100% | -1.53% | ||
| ALRM - EEFT | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.67% | ||
| NTCT - EEFT | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| SPSC - EEFT | 48% Loosely correlated | -3.71% | ||
| BL - EEFT | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.93% | ||
| ACIW - EEFT | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.98% | ||
More | ||||
MCCX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MCCX and EEFT have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCCX and EEFT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCCX | 100% | N/A | ||
| EEFT - MCCX | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.53% | ||
| CREX - MCCX | 30% Poorly correlated | -11.05% | ||
| SCFR - MCCX | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
| PAYD - MCCX | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SPMYY - MCCX | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||