Advertisement
EEFT vs GEN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEFT is a Hold and GEN is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EEFT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGEN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- EEFT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GEN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EEFT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GEN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EEFT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- GEN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
EEFT (@Computer Communications) experienced а -5.22% price change this week, while GEN (@Computer Communications) price change was -4.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +42.00%.
Reported Earning Dates
EEFT is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.
GEN is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (+0.17% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| EEFT | GEN | EEFT / GEN | |
| Capitalization | 3.82B | 18.6B | 21% |
| EBITDA | 686M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.384 | 11.720 | -80% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.85 | 31.46 | 41% |
| Revenue | 4.14B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 2.27B | 462M | 491% |
| Total Debt | 2.59B | 8.32B | 31% |
EEFT | GEN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 54 Fair valued | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 54 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | 34 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 34 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GEN's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EEFT (54) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that GEN’s stock grew somewhat faster than EEFT’s over the last 12 months.
GEN's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EEFT (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that GEN’s stock grew somewhat faster than EEFT’s over the last 12 months.
GEN's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as EEFT (36) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that GEN’s stock grew similarly to EEFT’s over the last 12 months.
GEN's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EEFT (80) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that GEN’s stock grew somewhat faster than EEFT’s over the last 12 months.
GEN's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EEFT (86) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that GEN’s stock grew somewhat faster than EEFT’s over the last 12 months.
| EEFT | GEN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 5 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 67% | 5 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 68% | 5 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | 5 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 67% | 5 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 68% | 5 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 65% | 15 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 68% | 5 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 73% | 6 days ago 62% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SQQQ | 17.95 | 0.64 | +3.70% |
| ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | |||
| HIPS | 12.20 | 0.09 | +0.73% |
| GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF | |||
| JHCR | 25.33 | N/A | N/A |
| JHancock Core Bond ETF | |||
| HYUP | 42.61 | -0.05 | -0.11% |
| Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF | |||
| LRGE | 79.97 | -1.21 | -1.50% |
| ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Select ETF | |||
EEFT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEFT has been loosely correlated with CPAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EEFT jumps, then CPAY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEFT | 100% | -0.87% | ||
| CPAY - EEFT | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| GEHC - EEFT | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| NATL - EEFT | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| DOX - EEFT | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| SSNC - EEFT | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
More | ||||
GEN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GEN has been closely correlated with PAYC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GEN jumps, then PAYC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GEN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GEN | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| PAYC - GEN | 66% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| EEFT - GEN | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| GEHC - GEN | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| ROP - GEN | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| ADSK - GEN | 55% Loosely correlated | +9.09% | ||
More | ||||