EEFT vs FOUR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEFT is a Hold and FOUR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EEFT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFOUR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- EEFT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- FOUR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EEFT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FOUR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EEFT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- FOUR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
EEFT (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.08% price change this week, while FOUR (@Packaged Software) price change was +5.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.83%.
Reported Earning Dates
EEFT is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
FOUR is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+2.25% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| EEFT | FOUR | EEFT / FOUR | |
| Capitalization | 4.97B | 4.12B | 121% |
| EBITDA | 589M | 366M | 161% |
| Gain YTD | 4.789 | 39.212 | 12% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.75 | 45.35 | 44% |
| Revenue | 3.69B | 2.57B | 144% |
| Total Cash | 1.78B | 455M | 391% |
| Total Debt | 2.01B | 1.78B | 113% |
EEFT | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 55 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| EEFT | FOUR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 71% | 9 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 86% |
EEFT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEFT has been loosely correlated with DJCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EEFT jumps, then DJCO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEFT | 100% | -0.20% | ||
| DJCO - EEFT | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| SPSC - EEFT | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| OLO - EEFT | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.78% | ||
| ACIW - EEFT | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.04% | ||
| BL - EEFT | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.74% | ||
More | ||||
FOUR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOUR has been loosely correlated with PCOR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOUR jumps, then PCOR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FOUR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOUR | 100% | -0.24% | ||
| PCOR - FOUR | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.23% | ||
| FLYW - FOUR | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.70% | ||
| EEFT - FOUR | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| PTC - FOUR | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| BAND - FOUR | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.94% | ||
More | ||||