EDVMF
Price
$29.56
Change
+$0.31 (+1.06%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
5.97B
10 days until earnings call
HL
Price
$5.82
Change
-$0.13 (-2.18%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
3.01B
11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EDVMF vs HL

Header iconEDVMF vs HL Comparison
Open Charts EDVMF vs HLBanner chart's image
ENDEAVOUR Mining
Price$29.56
Change+$0.31 (+1.06%)
Volume$96.05K
Capitalization5.97B
Hecla Mining
Price$5.82
Change-$0.13 (-2.18%)
Volume$14.05M
Capitalization3.01B
EDVMF vs HL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EDVMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EDVMF vs. HL commentary
Jul 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDVMF is a Hold and HL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2025
Stock price -- (EDVMF: $29.56 vs. HL: $5.82)
Brand notoriety: EDVMF: Not notable vs. HL: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EDVMF: 942% vs. HL: 68%
Market capitalization -- EDVMF: $5.97B vs. HL: $3.01B
EDVMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $5.97B. HL’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EDVMF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EDVMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EDVMF is a better buy in the long-term than HL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EDVMF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HL’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EDVMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HL’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EDVMF is a better buy in the short-term than HL.

Price Growth

EDVMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.34% price change this week, while HL (@Precious Metals) price change was -7.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

EDVMF is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

HL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.51% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EDVMF($5.97B) has a higher market cap than HL($3.01B). HL has higher P/E ratio than EDVMF: HL (1111.11) vs EDVMF (68.97). EDVMF YTD gains are higher at: 67.254 vs. HL (18.704). EDVMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 810M vs. HL (124M). EDVMF has more cash in the bank: 813M vs. HL (106M). HL has less debt than EDVMF: HL (663M) vs EDVMF (896M). EDVMF has higher revenues than HL: EDVMF (2.41B) vs HL (720M).
EDVMFHLEDVMF / HL
Capitalization5.97B3.01B199%
EBITDA810M124M653%
Gain YTD67.25418.704360%
P/E Ratio68.971111.116%
Revenue2.41B720M335%
Total Cash813M106M767%
Total Debt896M663M135%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EDVMF vs HL: Fundamental Ratings
EDVMF
HL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4562
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4363
SMR RATING
1..100
9086
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4558
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
293
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EDVMF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as HL (39) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that EDVMF’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

EDVMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as HL (63) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that EDVMF’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

HL's SMR Rating (86) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as EDVMF (90) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to EDVMF’s over the last 12 months.

EDVMF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as HL (58) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that EDVMF’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

EDVMF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HL (93) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that EDVMF’s stock grew significantly faster than HL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EDVMFHL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EDVMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SKYY123.451.05
+0.86%
First Trust Cloud Computing ETF
RZC25.45-0.01
-0.04%
Reinsurance Group of America
LOWV75.38-0.10
-0.14%
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF
IWMW39.16-0.12
-0.32%
iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF
VCV10.17-0.06
-0.59%
INVESCO CALIFORNIA VALUE MUNI Income TRUST

EDVMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EDVMF has been loosely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EDVMF jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EDVMF
1D Price
Change %
EDVMF100%
+1.06%
AEM - EDVMF
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
HL - EDVMF
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.18%
AGI - EDVMF
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.93%
PAAS - EDVMF
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
RGLD - EDVMF
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
More

HL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HL has been closely correlated with MAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HL jumps, then MAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HL
1D Price
Change %
HL100%
-2.18%
MAG - HL
77%
Closely correlated
-0.99%
PAAS - HL
75%
Closely correlated
-1.06%
AG - HL
75%
Closely correlated
-2.36%
FSM - HL
73%
Closely correlated
-2.93%
SA - HL
73%
Closely correlated
-0.88%
More