EDNMY
Price
$16.00
Change
+$0.60 (+3.90%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
16.23B
EHMEF
Price
$120.39
Change
-$0.59 (-0.49%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.59B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EDNMY vs EHMEF

Header iconEDNMY vs EHMEF Comparison
Open Charts EDNMY vs EHMEFBanner chart's image
Edenred Malakoff
Price$16.00
Change+$0.60 (+3.90%)
Volume$12.16K
Capitalization16.23B
GOEASY
Price$120.39
Change-$0.59 (-0.49%)
Volume$1.31K
Capitalization1.59B
EDNMY vs EHMEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EDNMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EHMEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EDNMY vs. EHMEF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDNMY is a StrongBuy and EHMEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (EDNMY: $16.00 vs. EHMEF: $120.39)
Brand notoriety: EDNMY and EHMEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EDNMY: 243% vs. EHMEF: 32%
Market capitalization -- EDNMY: $16.23B vs. EHMEF: $1.59B
EDNMY [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $16.23B. EHMEF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $1.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EDNMY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEHMEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EDNMY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EHMEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EHMEF is a better buy in the long-term than EDNMY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EDNMY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EHMEF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EDNMY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • EHMEF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EDNMY is a better buy in the short-term than EHMEF.

Price Growth

EDNMY (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +12.28% price change this week, while EHMEF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +3.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +3.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+3.75% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EDNMY($16.2B) has a higher market cap than EHMEF($1.59B). EDNMY has higher P/E ratio than EHMEF: EDNMY (37.04) vs EHMEF (12.79). EDNMY YTD gains are higher at: 9.805 vs. EHMEF (5.052). EDNMY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 887M vs. EHMEF (637M). EDNMY has more cash in the bank: 2.73B vs. EHMEF (41.8M). EHMEF has less debt than EDNMY: EHMEF (2.45B) vs EDNMY (4.28B). EDNMY has higher revenues than EHMEF: EDNMY (2.27B) vs EHMEF (1.07B).
EDNMYEHMEFEDNMY / EHMEF
Capitalization16.2B1.59B1,021%
EBITDA887M637M139%
Gain YTD9.8055.052194%
P/E Ratio37.0412.79290%
Revenue2.27B1.07B212%
Total Cash2.73B41.8M6,524%
Total Debt4.28B2.45B175%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EDNMY vs EHMEF: Fundamental Ratings
EDNMY
EHMEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1350
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10048
SMR RATING
1..100
8541
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5049
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9872
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EDNMY's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as EHMEF (29). This means that EDNMY’s stock grew similarly to EHMEF’s over the last 12 months.

EHMEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EDNMY (100). This means that EHMEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EDNMY’s over the last 12 months.

EHMEF's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EDNMY (85). This means that EHMEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EDNMY’s over the last 12 months.

EHMEF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as EDNMY (50). This means that EHMEF’s stock grew similarly to EDNMY’s over the last 12 months.

EHMEF's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as EDNMY (98). This means that EHMEF’s stock grew similarly to EDNMY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EDNMYEHMEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
58%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EDNMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EHMEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIQOX36.700.20
+0.55%
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Z
FPURX25.520.12
+0.47%
Fidelity Puritan
TSLFX4.770.01
+0.21%
Transamerica Small Cap Value R4
GSBAX14.75N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth C
IAAEX11.06N/A
N/A
Transamerica Mid Cap Value Opps I2

EDNMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EDNMY and CACC have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EDNMY and CACC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EDNMY
1D Price
Change %
EDNMY100%
+3.90%
CACC - EDNMY
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
EDNMF - EDNMY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EHMEF - EDNMY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELEEF - EDNMY
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
DVLN - EDNMY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

EHMEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EHMEF and TBCRF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EHMEF and TBCRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EHMEF
1D Price
Change %
EHMEF100%
N/A
TBCRF - EHMEF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
ECNCF - EHMEF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDNMF - EHMEF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDNMY - EHMEF
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.90%
ELEEF - EHMEF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
More