EDNMF
Price
$30.45
Change
+$0.05 (+0.16%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
16.23B
WSC
Price
$28.38
Change
+$0.43 (+1.54%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
8.83B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EDNMF vs WSC

Header iconEDNMF vs WSC Comparison
Open Charts EDNMF vs WSCBanner chart's image
Edenred Malakoff
Price$30.45
Change+$0.05 (+0.16%)
Volume$222
Capitalization16.23B
WillScot Holdings
Price$28.38
Change+$0.43 (+1.54%)
Volume$2.04M
Capitalization8.83B
EDNMF vs WSC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EDNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EDNMF vs. WSC commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDNMF is a Hold and WSC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (EDNMF: $30.45 vs. WSC: $28.38)
Brand notoriety: EDNMF and WSC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EDNMF: 23% vs. WSC: 116%
Market capitalization -- EDNMF: $16.23B vs. WSC: $8.83B
EDNMF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $16.23B. WSC’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $8.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EDNMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWSC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EDNMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WSC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WSC is a better buy in the long-term than EDNMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EDNMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WSC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EDNMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • WSC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EDNMF is a better buy in the short-term than WSC.

Price Growth

EDNMF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WSC (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +8.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +3.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

WSC is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+3.75% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EDNMF($16.2B) has a higher market cap than WSC($8.83B). EDNMF has higher P/E ratio than WSC: EDNMF (28.33) vs WSC (26.13). WSC YTD gains are higher at: -14.744 vs. EDNMF (-16.220). WSC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.01B vs. EDNMF (887M). EDNMF has more cash in the bank: 2.73B vs. WSC (11M). WSC has less debt than EDNMF: WSC (3.8B) vs EDNMF (4.28B). WSC (2.37B) and EDNMF (2.27B) have equivalent revenues.
EDNMFWSCEDNMF / WSC
Capitalization16.2B8.83B183%
EBITDA887M1.01B88%
Gain YTD-16.220-14.744110%
P/E Ratio28.3326.13108%
Revenue2.27B2.37B96%
Total Cash2.73B11M24,791%
Total Debt4.28B3.8B113%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EDNMF vs WSC: Fundamental Ratings
EDNMF
WSC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
509
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10064
SMR RATING
1..100
8588
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8161
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
982
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EDNMF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WSC (94) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that EDNMF’s stock grew significantly faster than WSC’s over the last 12 months.

WSC's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EDNMF (100) in the null industry. This means that WSC’s stock grew somewhat faster than EDNMF’s over the last 12 months.

EDNMF's SMR Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as WSC (88) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that EDNMF’s stock grew similarly to WSC’s over the last 12 months.

WSC's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as EDNMF (81) in the null industry. This means that WSC’s stock grew similarly to EDNMF’s over the last 12 months.

WSC's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for EDNMF (98) in the null industry. This means that WSC’s stock grew significantly faster than EDNMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EDNMFWSC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EDNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DT54.89-0.04
-0.07%
Dynatrace
CNMD52.17-0.17
-0.32%
CONMED Corp
HURA2.22-0.01
-0.45%
TuHURA Biosciences Inc
ESGL3.55-0.14
-3.74%
ESGL Holdings Limited
MAZE12.13-0.61
-4.79%
Maze Therapeutics Inc

EDNMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EDNMF has been loosely correlated with AL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EDNMF jumps, then AL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EDNMF
1D Price
Change %
EDNMF100%
N/A
AL - EDNMF
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
CACC - EDNMF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
WSC - EDNMF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
CTOS - EDNMF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
MIUFY - EDNMF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WSC has been loosely correlated with URI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WSC jumps, then URI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WSC
1D Price
Change %
WSC100%
+1.54%
URI - WSC
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.42%
MGRC - WSC
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.99%
OMF - WSC
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
R - WSC
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
AXP - WSC
59%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More