EDESY
Price
$19.73
Change
-$4.77 (-19.47%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
958.27M
GRGSF
Price
$6.32
Change
-$0.48 (-7.06%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
765.8M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EDESY vs GRGSF

Header iconEDESY vs GRGSF Comparison
Open Charts EDESY vs GRGSFBanner chart's image
Elders
Price$19.73
Change-$4.77 (-19.47%)
Volume$200
Capitalization958.27M
Grieg Seafood ASA
Price$6.32
Change-$0.48 (-7.06%)
Volume$150
Capitalization765.8M
EDESY vs GRGSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EDESY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EDESY vs. GRGSF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDESY is a Hold and GRGSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (EDESY: $19.15 vs. GRGSF: $6.32)
Brand notoriety: EDESY and GRGSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EDESY: 100% vs. GRGSF: 6%
Market capitalization -- EDESY: $958.27M vs. GRGSF: $765.8M
EDESY [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] is valued at $958.27M. GRGSF’s [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] market capitalization is $765.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry ranges from $34.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry is $2.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EDESY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGRGSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EDESY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GRGSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRGSF is a better buy in the long-term than EDESY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EDESY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRGSF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EDESY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • GRGSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EDESY is a better buy in the short-term than GRGSF.

Price Growth

EDESY (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GRGSF (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was -7.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.22%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+2.13% weekly)

The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EDESY($958M) has a higher market cap than GRGSF($766M). EDESY has higher P/E ratio than GRGSF: EDESY (15.18) vs GRGSF (2.94). GRGSF YTD gains are higher at: 0.637 vs. EDESY (-19.459).
EDESYGRGSFEDESY / GRGSF
Capitalization958M766M125%
EBITDAN/A-1.95B-
Gain YTD-19.4590.637-3,055%
P/E Ratio15.182.94516%
RevenueN/A7.28B-
Total CashN/A1.39B-
Total DebtN/A6.14B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EDESY vs GRGSF: Fundamental Ratings
EDESY
GRGSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4494
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8597
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8254
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
86100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EDESY's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as GRGSF (35). This means that EDESY’s stock grew similarly to GRGSF’s over the last 12 months.

EDESY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GRGSF (100). This means that EDESY’s stock grew similarly to GRGSF’s over the last 12 months.

EDESY's SMR Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as GRGSF (97). This means that EDESY’s stock grew similarly to GRGSF’s over the last 12 months.

GRGSF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as EDESY (82). This means that GRGSF’s stock grew similarly to EDESY’s over the last 12 months.

EDESY's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as GRGSF (100). This means that EDESY’s stock grew similarly to GRGSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EDESYGRGSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
9%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EDESY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDIVX50.960.14
+0.28%
Fidelity Diversified International
NAWCX47.34-0.04
-0.08%
Voya Global High Dividend Low Vol C
GTTUX56.50-0.34
-0.60%
Goldman Sachs Small Cp Val Insghts R6
HSSAX31.24-0.37
-1.17%
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd A
FMIMX38.76-0.49
-1.25%
FMI Common Stock Investor

EDESY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EDESY and CTUNF have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EDESY and CTUNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EDESY
1D Price
Change %
EDESY100%
N/A
CTUNF - EDESY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GARPF - EDESY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRGSF - EDESY
0%
Poorly correlated
-7.02%
GSFD - EDESY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HERB - EDESY
-11%
Poorly correlated
+13.33%
More

GRGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRGSF and GRCLF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRGSF and GRCLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRGSF
1D Price
Change %
GRGSF100%
-7.02%
GRCLF - GRGSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDESY - GRGSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTUNF - GRGSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HERB - GRGSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+13.33%
GARPY - GRGSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More