EDEN | TOP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago87% | 4 days ago80% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago74% | 4 days ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago76% | 4 days ago78% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% | 4 days ago75% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% | 4 days ago75% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | 4 days ago90% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago79% | 4 days ago76% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago81% | 11 days ago88% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% | 4 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | 4 days ago89% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that EDEN and GMAB have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EDEN and GMAB's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EDEN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EDEN | 100% | +0.48% | ||
GMAB - EDEN | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.44% | ||
TOP - EDEN | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.79% | ||
STG - EDEN | -1% Poorly correlated | -4.26% | ||
FLS - EDEN | -9% Poorly correlated | -0.74% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TOP has been loosely correlated with SIEB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TOP jumps, then SIEB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TOP | 100% | +0.79% | ||
SIEB - TOP | 41% Loosely correlated | -3.59% | ||
LGHL - TOP | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.70% | ||
SWIN - TOP | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.67% | ||
TIGR - TOP | 30% Poorly correlated | +4.13% | ||
MEGL - TOP | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |