Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EDEN vs EWU
EDEN vs EWU Comparison
Open Charts EDEN vs EWU
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
Price$120.62
Change-$1.98 (-1.62%)
Volume$1.98K
Net Assets241.73M
iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF
Price$40.42
Change-$0.36 (-0.88%)
Volume$981.06K
Net Assets3.1B
EDEN vs EWU Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EDEN vs. EWU commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDEN is a Hold and EWU is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWU has more net assets: 3.1B vs. EDEN (242M). EWU has a higher annual dividend yield than EDEN: EWU (19.233) vs EDEN (13.395). EDEN was incepted earlier than EWU: EDEN (13 years) vs EWU (29 years). EWU (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than EDEN (0.53). EDEN has a higher turnover EWU (10.00) vs EWU (10.00).
| EDEN | EWU | EDEN / EWU | |
| Gain YTD | 13.395 | 19.233 | 70% |
| Net Assets | 242M | 3.1B | 8% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.50 | 106% |
| Turnover | 14.00 | 10.00 | 140% |
| Yield | 1.39 | 3.53 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 29 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EDEN | EWU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EDEN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EDEN has been loosely correlated with GMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EDEN jumps, then GMAB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EDEN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDEN | 100% | -1.61% | ||
| GMAB - EDEN | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| TOP - EDEN | 17% Poorly correlated | -2.34% | ||
| STG - EDEN | 7% Poorly correlated | -7.98% | ||
| FLS - EDEN | -7% Poorly correlated | -2.68% |
EWU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWU has been closely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWU jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y