Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EDEN vs EWA
EDEN vs EWA Comparison
Open Charts EDEN vs EWA
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
Price$111.97
Change+$1.14 (+1.03%)
Volume$2.76K
Net Assets195.24M
iShares MSCI Australia ETF
Price$26.92
Change-$0.05 (-0.19%)
Volume$6.7M
Net Assets1.43B
EDEN vs EWA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EDEN vs. EWA commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDEN is a Hold and EWA is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWA has more net assets: 1.43B vs. EDEN (195M). EWA has a higher annual dividend yield than EDEN: EWA (14.554) vs EDEN (6.707). EDEN was incepted earlier than EWA: EDEN (14 years) vs EWA (30 years). EWA (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than EDEN (0.53). EDEN has a higher turnover EWA (5.00) vs EWA (5.00).
| EDEN | EWA | EDEN / EWA | |
| Gain YTD | 6.707 | 14.554 | 46% |
| Net Assets | 195M | 1.43B | 14% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.50 | 106% |
| Turnover | 14.00 | 5.00 | 280% |
| Yield | 1.83 | 3.01 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 30 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EDEN | EWA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 82% | 10 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EDEN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EDEN and GMAB have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EDEN and GMAB's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EDEN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDEN | 100% | N/A | ||
| GMAB - EDEN | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.28% | ||
| TOP - EDEN | 9% Poorly correlated | -3.20% | ||
| SIM - EDEN | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CHR - EDEN | 3% Poorly correlated | -11.48% | ||
| FLS - EDEN | -4% Poorly correlated | +0.24% | ||
More | ||||
EWA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWA has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWA jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y