Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EDEN vs EWA
EDEN vs EWA Comparison
Open Charts EDEN vs EWA
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
Price$120.62
Change-$1.98 (-1.62%)
Volume$1.98K
Net Assets241.73M
iShares MSCI Australia ETF
Price$26.32
Change-$0.32 (-1.20%)
Volume$3.66M
Net Assets1.56B
EDEN vs EWA Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EDEN vs. EWA commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDEN is a Hold and EWA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWA has more net assets: 1.56B vs. EDEN (242M). EDEN has a higher annual dividend yield than EWA: EDEN (13.395) vs EWA (10.310). EDEN was incepted earlier than EWA: EDEN (13 years) vs EWA (29 years). EWA (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than EDEN (0.53). EDEN has a higher turnover EWA (5.00) vs EWA (5.00).
| EDEN | EWA | EDEN / EWA | |
| Gain YTD | 13.395 | 10.310 | 130% |
| Net Assets | 242M | 1.56B | 15% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.50 | 106% |
| Turnover | 14.00 | 5.00 | 280% |
| Yield | 1.39 | 3.43 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 29 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EDEN | EWA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EDEN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EDEN has been loosely correlated with GMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EDEN jumps, then GMAB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EDEN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDEN | 100% | -1.61% | ||
| GMAB - EDEN | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| TOP - EDEN | 17% Poorly correlated | -2.34% | ||
| STG - EDEN | 7% Poorly correlated | -7.98% | ||
| FLS - EDEN | -7% Poorly correlated | -2.68% |
EWA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWA has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWA jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y