Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EDEN vs EWA
EDEN vs EWA Comparison
Open Charts EDEN vs EWA
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
Price$107.83
Change+$0.51 (+0.48%)
Volume$4.37K
Net Assets183.11M
iShares MSCI Australia ETF
Price$26.83
Change+$0.09 (+0.34%)
Volume$1.46M
Net Assets1.51B
EDEN vs EWA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EDEN vs. EWA commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDEN is a Hold and EWA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWA has more net assets: 1.51B vs. EDEN (183M). EWA has a higher annual dividend yield than EDEN: EWA (14.171) vs EDEN (2.756). EDEN was incepted earlier than EWA: EDEN (14 years) vs EWA (29 years). EWA (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than EDEN (0.53). EDEN has a higher turnover EWA (5.00) vs EWA (5.00).
| EDEN | EWA | EDEN / EWA | |
| Gain YTD | 2.756 | 14.171 | 19% |
| Net Assets | 183M | 1.51B | 12% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.50 | 106% |
| Turnover | 14.00 | 5.00 | 280% |
| Yield | 1.92 | 3.13 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EDEN | EWA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 7 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EDEN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EDEN and GMAB have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EDEN and GMAB's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EDEN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDEN | 100% | +0.48% | ||
| GMAB - EDEN | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.44% | ||
| TOP - EDEN | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.79% | ||
| STG - EDEN | -1% Poorly correlated | -4.26% | ||
| FLS - EDEN | -9% Poorly correlated | -0.74% |
EWA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWA has been loosely correlated with RIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWA jumps, then RIO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y