Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EDEN vs EWA
EDEN vs EWA Comparison
Open Charts EDEN vs EWA
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
Price$108.91
Change-$0.65 (-0.59%)
Volume$7.79K
Net Assets186.68M
iShares MSCI Australia ETF
Price$27.00
Change+$0.07 (+0.26%)
Volume$2.84M
Net Assets1.54B
EDEN vs EWA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EDEN vs. EWA commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDEN is a Hold and EWA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWA has more net assets: 1.54B vs. EDEN (187M). EWA has a higher annual dividend yield than EDEN: EWA (14.895) vs EDEN (3.790). EDEN was incepted earlier than EWA: EDEN (14 years) vs EWA (30 years). EWA (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than EDEN (0.53). EDEN has a higher turnover EWA (5.00) vs EWA (5.00).
| EDEN | EWA | EDEN / EWA | |
| Gain YTD | 3.790 | 14.895 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 187M | 1.54B | 12% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.50 | 106% |
| Turnover | 14.00 | 5.00 | 280% |
| Yield | 1.82 | 3.00 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 30 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EDEN | EWA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EDEN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EDEN and GMAB have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EDEN and GMAB's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EDEN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDEN | 100% | -0.59% | ||
| GMAB - EDEN | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| STG - EDEN | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.08% | ||
| TOP - EDEN | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.87% | ||
| FLS - EDEN | -8% Poorly correlated | +0.82% |
EWA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWA has been loosely correlated with RIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWA jumps, then RIO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y