EDBL
Price
$2.89
Change
-$0.18 (-5.86%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.83M
LMNR
Price
$15.40
Change
-$0.66 (-4.11%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
352.18M
81 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EDBL vs LMNR

Header iconEDBL vs LMNR Comparison
Open Charts EDBL vs LMNRBanner chart's image
Edible Garden AG
Price$2.89
Change-$0.18 (-5.86%)
Volume$56.08K
Capitalization1.83M
Limoneira
Price$15.40
Change-$0.66 (-4.11%)
Volume$74.13K
Capitalization352.18M
EDBL vs LMNR Comparison Chart
Loading...
EDBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LMNR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EDBL vs. LMNR commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDBL is a Hold and LMNR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (EDBL: $2.89 vs. LMNR: $15.40)
Brand notoriety: EDBL and LMNR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EDBL: 1% vs. LMNR: 86%
Market capitalization -- EDBL: $1.83M vs. LMNR: $352.18M
EDBL [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] is valued at $1.83M. LMNR’s [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] market capitalization is $352.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry ranges from $34.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry is $2.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EDBL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLMNR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EDBL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LMNR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EDBL is a better buy in the long-term than LMNR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EDBL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LMNR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EDBL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LMNR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both EDBL and LMNR are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

EDBL (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) experienced а +9.89% price change this week, while LMNR (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was +0.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +3.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

LMNR is expected to report earnings on Sep 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+3.04% weekly)

The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LMNR($352M) has a higher market cap than EDBL($1.83M). LMNR YTD gains are higher at: -36.770 vs. EDBL (-64.044). EDBL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -6.87M vs. LMNR (-9.15M). EDBL has more cash in the bank: 2.58M vs. LMNR (527K). EDBL has less debt than LMNR: EDBL (4.58M) vs LMNR (56.4M). LMNR has higher revenues than EDBL: LMNR (182M) vs EDBL (13M).
EDBLLMNREDBL / LMNR
Capitalization1.83M352M1%
EBITDA-6.87M-9.15M75%
Gain YTD-64.044-36.770174%
P/E RatioN/A36.36-
Revenue13M182M7%
Total Cash2.58M527K489%
Total Debt4.58M56.4M8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LMNR: Fundamental Ratings
LMNR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
75
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EDBLLMNR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EDBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LMNR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GALT1.370.03
+2.24%
Galectin Therapeutics
BIOA4.520.03
+0.67%
BioAge Labs Inc.
BKE42.77-0.88
-2.02%
Buckle (The)
CFLT23.65-0.76
-3.11%
Confluent
LIND10.60-0.56
-5.02%
Lindblad Expeditions Holdings

EDBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EDBL and LMNR have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EDBL and LMNR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EDBL
1D Price
Change %
EDBL100%
-5.86%
LMNR - EDBL
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.11%
DOLE - EDBL
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
AFRI - EDBL
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
AGRI - EDBL
12%
Poorly correlated
-5.88%
ALCO - EDBL
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
More

LMNR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMNR has been loosely correlated with AFRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LMNR jumps, then AFRI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LMNR
1D Price
Change %
LMNR100%
-4.11%
AFRI - LMNR
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
ALCO - LMNR
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
DOLE - LMNR
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
VITL - LMNR
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
TSN - LMNR
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
More