ED
Price
$101.19
Change
+$0.12 (+0.12%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
36.49B
11 days until earnings call
NGG
Price
$76.95
Change
+$1.05 (+1.38%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
74.65B
18 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ED vs NGG

Header iconED vs NGG Comparison
Open Charts ED vs NGGBanner chart's image
Consolidated Edison
Price$101.19
Change+$0.12 (+0.12%)
Volume$1.6M
Capitalization36.49B
National Grid
Price$76.95
Change+$1.05 (+1.38%)
Volume$1.08M
Capitalization74.65B
ED vs NGG Comparison Chart in %
ED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NGG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ED vs. NGG commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ED is a Hold and NGG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (ED: $101.19 vs. NGG: $76.95)
Brand notoriety: ED and NGG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ED: 71% vs. NGG: 178%
Market capitalization -- ED: $36.49B vs. NGG: $74.65B
ED [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $36.49B. NGG’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $74.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $174.07B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $23.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ED’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNGG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ED’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NGG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NGG is a better buy in the long-term than ED.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ED’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NGG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ED’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NGG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ED is a better buy in the short-term than NGG.

Price Growth

ED (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -1.17% price change this week, while NGG (@Electric Utilities) price change was +3.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

ED is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

NGG is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+1.38% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NGG($74.6B) has a higher market cap than ED($36.5B). NGG (19.20) and ED (18.40) have similar P/E ratio . NGG YTD gains are higher at: 33.275 vs. ED (16.348). NGG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.64B vs. ED (5.84B). NGG has more cash in the bank: 6.93B vs. ED (1.51B). ED has less debt than NGG: ED (27.1B) vs NGG (47.5B). NGG has higher revenues than ED: NGG (18.4B) vs ED (16.2B).
EDNGGED / NGG
Capitalization36.5B74.6B49%
EBITDA5.84B7.64B76%
Gain YTD16.34833.27549%
P/E Ratio18.4019.2096%
Revenue16.2B18.4B88%
Total Cash1.51B6.93B22%
Total Debt27.1B47.5B57%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ED vs NGG: Fundamental Ratings
ED
NGG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2743
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2230
SMR RATING
1..100
7699
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5548
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6043
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NGG's Valuation (47) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as ED (60). This means that NGG’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.

ED's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as NGG (30). This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to NGG’s over the last 12 months.

ED's SMR Rating (76) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as NGG (99). This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to NGG’s over the last 12 months.

NGG's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as ED (55). This means that NGG’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.

NGG's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as ED (60). This means that NGG’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EDNGG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NGG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JHEM32.320.08
+0.26%
JHancock Multifactor Em Mkts ETF
PMBS49.97-0.01
-0.03%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Act ETF
COPJ35.38-1.52
-4.12%
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
PSLV17.27-0.80
-4.43%
Sprott Physical Silver Trust
SETM27.05-1.38
-4.85%
Sprott Critical Materials ETF

ED and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ED has been closely correlated with WEC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ED jumps, then WEC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ED
1D Price
Change %
ED100%
+0.12%
WEC - ED
80%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
DUK - ED
80%
Closely correlated
+0.89%
CMS - ED
79%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
SO - ED
79%
Closely correlated
-0.64%
EXC - ED
76%
Closely correlated
+0.89%
More

NGG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NGG has been closely correlated with FTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NGG jumps, then FTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NGG
1D Price
Change %
NGG100%
+1.38%
FTS - NGG
67%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
ES - NGG
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.68%
DUK - NGG
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.89%
ED - NGG
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
DTE - NGG
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
More