ED
Price
$95.41
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
91 days until earnings call
FTS
Price
$43.99
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
85 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ED vs FTS

Header iconED vs FTS Comparison
Open Charts ED vs FTSBanner chart's image
Consolidated Edison
Price$95.41
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.13M
CapitalizationN/A
Fortis
Price$43.99
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$272.28K
CapitalizationN/A
ED vs FTS Comparison Chart
Loading...
ED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ED vs. FTS commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ED is a StrongBuy and FTS is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (ED: $95.41 vs. FTS: $43.99)
Brand notoriety: ED and FTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ED: 113% vs. FTS: 46%
Market capitalization -- ED: $31.21B vs. FTS: $19.48B
ED [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $31.21B. FTS’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $19.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $131.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $18.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ED’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ED’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ED is a better buy in the long-term than FTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ED’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ED’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FTS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ED is a better buy in the short-term than FTS.

Price Growth

ED (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -2.76% price change this week, while FTS (@Electric Utilities) price change was +0.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

ED is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

FTS is expected to report earnings on Feb 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (-0.04% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ED($31.2B) has a higher market cap than FTS($19.5B). FTS has higher P/E ratio than ED: FTS (17.13) vs ED (12.53). ED YTD gains are higher at: 8.579 vs. FTS (6.954). ED has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.06B vs. FTS (5.15B). ED has more cash in the bank: 1.19B vs. FTS (625M). ED has less debt than FTS: ED (25B) vs FTS (30B). ED has higher revenues than FTS: ED (14.7B) vs FTS (11.5B).
EDFTSED / FTS
Capitalization31.2B19.5B160%
EBITDA6.06B5.15B118%
Gain YTD8.5796.954123%
P/E Ratio12.5317.1373%
Revenue14.7B11.5B128%
Total Cash1.19B625M190%
Total Debt25B30B83%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ED vs FTS: Fundamental Ratings
ED
FTS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6169
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4384
SMR RATING
1..100
6479
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5751
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3363
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FTS's Valuation (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ED (88) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that FTS’s stock grew somewhat faster than ED’s over the last 12 months.

ED's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTS (84) in the null industry. This means that ED’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTS’s over the last 12 months.

ED's SMR Rating (64) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as FTS (79) in the null industry. This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.

FTS's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as ED (57) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.

ED's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as FTS (63) in the null industry. This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EDFTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X90584.1640002628.351600
+2.99%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA330.241.75
+0.53%
Tesla
AAPL225.120.89
+0.40%
Apple
SPY597.190.29
+0.05%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.46-0.38
-1.42%
GameStop Corp

ED and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ED has been closely correlated with CMS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ED jumps, then CMS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ED
1D Price
Change %
ED100%
-0.83%
CMS - ED
84%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
WEC - ED
83%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
DTE - ED
81%
Closely correlated
-1.21%
PPL - ED
79%
Closely correlated
+0.75%
LNT - ED
79%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
More

FTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTS has been closely correlated with OGE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTS jumps, then OGE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTS
1D Price
Change %
FTS100%
-0.59%
OGE - FTS
70%
Closely correlated
-0.85%
LNT - FTS
67%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
ED - FTS
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
BIP - FTS
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
WEC - FTS
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
More