ED
Price
$99.62
Change
+$1.27 (+1.29%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
35.93B
32 days until earnings call
FTS
Price
$49.67
Change
+$0.20 (+0.40%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
24.99B
37 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ED vs FTS

Header iconED vs FTS Comparison
Open Charts ED vs FTSBanner chart's image
Consolidated Edison
Price$99.62
Change+$1.27 (+1.29%)
Volume$1.95M
Capitalization35.93B
Fortis
Price$49.67
Change+$0.20 (+0.40%)
Volume$445.07K
Capitalization24.99B
ED vs FTS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ED vs. FTS commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ED is a Buy and FTS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (ED: $99.62 vs. FTS: $49.67)
Brand notoriety: ED and FTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ED: 80% vs. FTS: 79%
Market capitalization -- ED: $35.93B vs. FTS: $24.99B
ED [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $35.93B. FTS’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $24.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $156.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $22.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ED’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ED’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ED and FTS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ED’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ED’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FTS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FTS is a better buy in the short-term than ED.

Price Growth

ED (@Electric Utilities) experienced а +3.42% price change this week, while FTS (@Electric Utilities) price change was +0.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

ED is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

FTS is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+0.34% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ED($35.9B) has a higher market cap than FTS($25B). FTS has higher P/E ratio than ED: FTS (20.30) vs ED (18.11). FTS YTD gains are higher at: 19.485 vs. ED (14.543). ED (5.84B) and FTS (5.78B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . ED has more cash in the bank: 1.51B vs. FTS (221M). ED has less debt than FTS: ED (27.1B) vs FTS (33.8B). ED has higher revenues than FTS: ED (16.2B) vs FTS (11.9B).
EDFTSED / FTS
Capitalization35.9B25B144%
EBITDA5.84B5.78B101%
Gain YTD14.54319.48575%
P/E Ratio18.1120.3089%
Revenue16.2B11.9B136%
Total Cash1.51B221M681%
Total Debt27.1B33.8B80%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ED vs FTS: Fundamental Ratings
ED
FTS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2115
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2261
SMR RATING
1..100
7677
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5853
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5739
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3665

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FTS's Valuation (59) in the null industry is in the same range as ED (61) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.

ED's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTS (61) in the null industry. This means that ED’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTS’s over the last 12 months.

ED's SMR Rating (76) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as FTS (77) in the null industry. This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.

FTS's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as ED (58) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.

FTS's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as ED (57) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EDFTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
36%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KBWB79.030.58
+0.74%
Invesco KBW Bank ETF
LSVD28.000.03
+0.11%
LSV Disciplined Value ETF
ERTH46.980.03
+0.06%
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF
GUG15.59-0.05
-0.32%
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund
PCIG9.31-0.03
-0.37%
Polen Capital International Growth ETF

ED and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ED has been closely correlated with WEC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ED jumps, then WEC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ED
1D Price
Change %
ED100%
+1.29%
WEC - ED
80%
Closely correlated
+1.45%
CMS - ED
79%
Closely correlated
+1.21%
DUK - ED
79%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
SO - ED
78%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
EXC - ED
77%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
More

FTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTS has been loosely correlated with DUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTS jumps, then DUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTS
1D Price
Change %
FTS100%
+0.40%
DUK - FTS
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
SO - FTS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
ED - FTS
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
WEC - FTS
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.45%
EXC - FTS
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
More