ED
Price
$108.32
Change
+$0.87 (+0.81%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
38.78B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FTS
Price
$54.30
Change
+$0.22 (+0.41%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
27.26B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ED vs FTS

Header iconED vs FTS Comparison
Open Charts ED vs FTSBanner chart's image
Consolidated Edison
Price$108.32
Change+$0.87 (+0.81%)
Volume$19.26K
Capitalization38.78B
Fortis
Price$54.30
Change+$0.22 (+0.41%)
Volume$2.97K
Capitalization27.26B
ED vs FTS Comparison Chart in %
ED
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ED vs. FTS commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ED is a Buy and FTS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (ED: $107.45 vs. FTS: $54.08)
Brand notoriety: ED and FTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ED: 103% vs. FTS: 159%
Market capitalization -- ED: $38.78B vs. FTS: $27.26B
ED [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $38.78B. FTS’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $27.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $184.98B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $23.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ED’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ED’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ED is a better buy in the long-term than FTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ED’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ED’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FTS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ED is a better buy in the short-term than FTS.

Price Growth

ED (@Electric Utilities) experienced а +1.99% price change this week, while FTS (@Electric Utilities) price change was +0.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

ED is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

FTS is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (-0.20% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ED($38.8B) has a higher market cap than FTS($27.3B). FTS has higher P/E ratio than ED: FTS (22.01) vs ED (18.78). ED YTD gains are higher at: 8.186 vs. FTS (4.120). ED (6.05B) and FTS (5.86B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . FTS has more cash in the bank: 389M vs. ED (181M). ED has less debt than FTS: ED (26.7B) vs FTS (34.4B). ED has higher revenues than FTS: ED (16.6B) vs FTS (12B).
EDFTSED / FTS
Capitalization38.8B27.3B142%
EBITDA6.05B5.86B103%
Gain YTD8.1864.120199%
P/E Ratio18.7822.0185%
Revenue16.6B12B138%
Total Cash181M389M47%
Total Debt26.7B34.4B78%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ED vs FTS: Fundamental Ratings
ED
FTS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
165
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1954
SMR RATING
1..100
7476
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3052
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4637
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FTS's Valuation (60) in the null industry is in the same range as ED (64) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.

ED's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTS (54) in the null industry. This means that ED’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTS’s over the last 12 months.

ED's SMR Rating (74) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as FTS (76) in the null industry. This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.

ED's Price Growth Rating (30) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as FTS (52) in the null industry. This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.

FTS's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as ED (46) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EDFTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
39%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ED
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UPGR27.130.65
+2.45%
Xtrackers US Green Infras Sel Eq ETF
VEGI43.380.67
+1.57%
iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF
IBHH23.67N/A
-0.02%
iShares iBonds 2028 Term HY & Inc ETF
IYH64.62-0.65
-1.00%
iShares US Healthcare ETF
ODOT1.72-0.30
-14.88%
Osprey Polkadot Trust

ED and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ED has been closely correlated with WEC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ED jumps, then WEC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ED
1D Price
Change %
ED100%
+1.93%
WEC - ED
80%
Closely correlated
+2.20%
DUK - ED
79%
Closely correlated
+1.82%
SO - ED
79%
Closely correlated
+2.20%
EXC - ED
77%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
AEP - ED
76%
Closely correlated
+1.98%
More

FTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTS has been loosely correlated with DUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTS jumps, then DUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTS
1D Price
Change %
FTS100%
+2.60%
DUK - FTS
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.82%
NGG - FTS
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.91%
ED - FTS
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.93%
SO - FTS
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
WEC - FTS
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
More