Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECTMX vs RWMHX
ECTMX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts ECTMX vs RWMHX
Eaton Vance Dividend Builder C
Price$16.35
Change-$1.14 (-6.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets895.71M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$66.01
Change-$1.03 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
ECTMX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECTMX vs. RWMHX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECTMX is a StrongBuy and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. ECTMX (896M). RWMHX pays higher dividends than ECTMX: RWMHX (1.36) vs ECTMX (0.49). ECTMX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: ECTMX (32 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). ECTMX (1.74) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). ECTMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECTMX: RWMHX (250) vs ECTMX (1000). RWMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.40 vs. ECTMX (-0.54). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 37.20 vs. ECTMX (-2.71).
| ECTMX | RWMHX | ECTMX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.41 | 424% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.41 | 424% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.766 | 1.523 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 896M | 208B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.36 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.54 | 5.40 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.85 | 30.10 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.71 | 37.20 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.99 | 96.94 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement