Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECTMX vs RWEBX
ECTMX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts ECTMX vs RWEBX
Eaton Vance Dividend Builder C
Price$16.35
Change-$1.14 (-6.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets895.71M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.66
Change-$1.07 (-1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
ECTMX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECTMX vs. RWEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECTMX is a StrongBuy and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. ECTMX (896M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than ECTMX: RWEBX (0.78) vs ECTMX (0.49). ECTMX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: ECTMX (32 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). ECTMX (1.74) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). ECTMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECTMX: RWEBX (250) vs ECTMX (1000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.66 vs. ECTMX (-0.54). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.53 vs. ECTMX (-2.71).
| ECTMX | RWEBX | ECTMX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.06 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.06 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.766 | 1.452 | 190% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 896M | 208B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.78 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.54 | 4.66 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.85 | 27.48 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.71 | 33.53 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.99 | 91.10 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement