Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECTMX vs RMFCX
ECTMX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ECTMX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Dividend Builder C
Price$17.36
Change+$0.04 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets925.8M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.51
Change+$0.17 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
ECTMX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECTMX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECTMX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. ECTMX (926M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than ECTMX: RMFCX (1.20) vs ECTMX (0.55). ECTMX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ECTMX (32 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). ECTMX (1.74) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). ECTMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECTMX: RMFCX (250) vs ECTMX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.96 vs. ECTMX (1.02). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.10 vs. ECTMX (12.86).
| ECTMX | RMFCX | ECTMX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.91 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.91 | 191% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.868 | 13.689 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 926M | 111B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.20 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.02 | 4.96 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.64 | 38.79 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.86 | 57.10 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.92 | 91.18 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement