ECTM
Price
$0.65
Change
+$0.03 (+4.84%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
17.96M
NFG
Price
$84.96
Change
+$0.62 (+0.74%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
4.92B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ECTM vs NFG

Header iconECTM vs NFG Comparison
Open Charts ECTM vs NFGBanner chart's image
ECA Marcellus Trust I
Price$0.65
Change+$0.03 (+4.84%)
Volume$4.14K
Capitalization17.96M
National Fuel Gas
Price$84.96
Change+$0.62 (+0.74%)
Volume$646.75K
Capitalization4.92B
ECTM vs NFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ECTM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECTM vs. NFG commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECTM is a Hold and NFG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (ECTM: $0.65 vs. NFG: $84.96)
Brand notoriety: ECTM and NFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECTM: 13% vs. NFG: 118%
Market capitalization -- ECTM: $17.96M vs. NFG: $4.92B
ECTM [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $17.96M. NFG’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $4.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $461.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $63.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECTM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ECTM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NFG is a better buy in the long-term than ECTM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECTM’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NFG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ECTM’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NFG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NFG is a better buy in the short-term than ECTM.

Price Growth

ECTM (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -4.46% price change this week, while NFG (@Integrated Oil) price change was -0.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -2.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

NFG is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (-2.11% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NFG($4.92B) has a higher market cap than ECTM($18M). NFG has higher P/E ratio than ECTM: NFG (11.18) vs ECTM (1.95). ECTM YTD gains are higher at: 51.971 vs. NFG (40.934). NFG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.15B vs. ECTM (9.25M). NFG has more cash in the bank: 41.7M vs. ECTM (2.07M). NFG has higher revenues than ECTM: NFG (2.04B) vs ECTM (10.7M).
ECTMNFGECTM / NFG
Capitalization18M4.92B0%
EBITDA9.25M1.15B1%
Gain YTD51.97140.934127%
P/E Ratio1.9511.1817%
Revenue10.7M2.04B1%
Total Cash2.07M41.7M5%
Total DebtN/A2.69B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ECTM vs NFG: Fundamental Ratings
ECTM
NFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5038
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7818
SMR RATING
1..100
6988
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3741
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
631
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ECTM's Valuation (4) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is significantly better than the same rating for NFG (87) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that ECTM’s stock grew significantly faster than NFG’s over the last 12 months.

NFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECTM (78) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that NFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECTM’s over the last 12 months.

ECTM's SMR Rating (69) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as NFG (88) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that ECTM’s stock grew similarly to NFG’s over the last 12 months.

ECTM's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as NFG (41) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that ECTM’s stock grew similarly to NFG’s over the last 12 months.

NFG's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECTM (63) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that NFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECTM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECTMNFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ECTM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LVOVX19.730.10
+0.51%
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities R6
CIBFX76.060.22
+0.29%
American Funds Capital Income Bldr F1
LMSIX14.100.04
+0.28%
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity I
MLPZX6.550.01
+0.15%
Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Y
HDMBX14.400.01
+0.07%
Hartford Small Company HLS IB

ECTM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ECTM and SLNG have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECTM and SLNG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECTM
1D Price
Change %
ECTM100%
+4.44%
SLNG - ECTM
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.16%
EC - ECTM
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.35%
NFG - ECTM
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
E - ECTM
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
EQNR - ECTM
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
More

NFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NFG has been loosely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NFG jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NFG
1D Price
Change %
NFG100%
+0.74%
SHEL - NFG
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.01%
CVX - NFG
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
XOM - NFG
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
SU - NFG
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BP - NFG
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
More