Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECSMX vs NRGSX
ECSMX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts ECSMX vs NRGSX
Eaton Vance Small-Cap C
Price$9.88
Change-$0.82 (-7.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets142.34M
ECSMX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECSMX vs. NRGSX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECSMX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.49B vs. ECSMX (142M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than ECSMX: NRGSX (0.48) vs ECSMX (0.00). ECSMX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: ECSMX (24 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). ECSMX (2.11) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). ECSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. NRGSX (23.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECSMX: NRGSX (0) vs ECSMX (1000). NRGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.75 vs. ECSMX (-14.31). ECSMX return over 5 years is better than : -19.74 vs. NRGSX (-23.10).
| ECSMX | NRGSX | ECSMX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.74 | 265% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.74 | 285% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.329 | 5.452 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 142M | 8.49B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.31 | -12.75 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.09 | -6.33 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.74 | -23.10 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.02 | 24.83 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers