Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECSMX vs NRGSX
ECSMX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts ECSMX vs NRGSX
Eaton Vance Small-Cap C
Price$10.69
Change+$0.06 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.59M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$62.80
Change+$0.25 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.71B
ECSMX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECSMX vs. NRGSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECSMX is a Buy and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.71B vs. ECSMX (160M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than ECSMX: NRGSX (0.06) vs ECSMX (0.00). ECSMX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: ECSMX (23 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). ECSMX (2.11) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). ECSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECSMX: NRGSX (0) vs ECSMX (1000). ECSMX (-9.87) and NRGSX (-10.12) have marching annual gain over last year. ECSMX return over 5 years is better than : 6.69 vs. NRGSX (-2.32).
| ECSMX | NRGSX | ECSMX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.74 | 265% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.74 | 285% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.649 | -3.902 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160M | 8.71B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.87 | -10.12 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.89 | 5.90 | 185% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.69 | -2.32 | -288% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.42 | 10.24 | -160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers