Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECSMX vs NRGEX
ECSMX vs NRGEX Comparison
Open Charts ECSMX vs NRGEX
Eaton Vance Small-Cap C
Price$10.69
Change+$0.06 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.59M
Neuberger Berman Genesis E
Price$63.33
Change+$0.26 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.71B
ECSMX vs NRGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGEX has more cash in the bank: 8.71B vs. ECSMX (160M). NRGEX pays higher dividends than ECSMX: NRGEX (0.54) vs ECSMX (0.00). ECSMX was incepted earlier than NRGEX: ECSMX (23 years) vs NRGEX (4 years). ECSMX (2.11) is less costly to investors than NRGEX (0.69). ECSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. NRGEX (13.00). NRGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECSMX: NRGEX (0) vs ECSMX (1000). NRGEX (-9.46) and ECSMX (-9.87) have marching annual gain over last year.
| ECSMX | NRGEX | ECSMX / NRGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.03 | 6,533% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.69 | 306% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.649 | -3.342 | 169% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160M | 8.71B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.54 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.87 | -9.46 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.89 | 8.17 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.69 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.42 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers