ECRTF
Price
$1.60
Change
-$0.23 (-12.57%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
211.7M
GSMGF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 30 closing price
Capitalization
22.48M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ECRTF vs GSMGF

Header iconECRTF vs GSMGF Comparison
Open Charts ECRTF vs GSMGFBanner chart's image
Atex Resources
Price$1.60
Change-$0.23 (-12.57%)
Volume$8.4K
Capitalization211.7M
Indiana Res
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization22.48M
ECRTF vs GSMGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ECRTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECRTF vs. GSMGF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECRTF is a Hold and GSMGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (ECRTF: $1.60 vs. GSMGF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: ECRTF and GSMGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECRTF: 199% vs. GSMGF: 12%
Market capitalization -- ECRTF: $211.7M vs. GSMGF: $22.48M
ECRTF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $211.7M. GSMGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $22.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECRTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGSMGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ECRTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GSMGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GSMGF is a better buy in the long-term than ECRTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECRTF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSMGF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ECRTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GSMGF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GSMGF is a better buy in the short-term than ECRTF.

Price Growth

ECRTF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -19.60% price change this week, while GSMGF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECRTF($212M) has a higher market cap than GSMGF($22.5M). ECRTF YTD gains are higher at: 28.000 vs. GSMGF (15.625). GSMGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.42M vs. ECRTF (-31.28M). ECRTF has more cash in the bank: 7.81M vs. GSMGF (504K). GSMGF has less debt than ECRTF: GSMGF (315K) vs ECRTF (10.1M). GSMGF has higher revenues than ECRTF: GSMGF (212M) vs ECRTF (0).
ECRTFGSMGFECRTF / GSMGF
Capitalization212M22.5M942%
EBITDA-31.28M-1.42M2,202%
Gain YTD28.00015.625179%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0212M-
Total Cash7.81M504K1,550%
Total Debt10.1M315K3,206%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ECRTF vs GSMGF: Fundamental Ratings
ECRTF
GSMGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2276
SMR RATING
1..100
10010
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4247
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10039
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSMGF's Valuation (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECRTF (73). This means that GSMGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECRTF’s over the last 12 months.

ECRTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSMGF (76). This means that ECRTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSMGF’s over the last 12 months.

GSMGF's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ECRTF (100). This means that GSMGF’s stock grew significantly faster than ECRTF’s over the last 12 months.

ECRTF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as GSMGF (47). This means that ECRTF’s stock grew similarly to GSMGF’s over the last 12 months.

GSMGF's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECRTF (100). This means that GSMGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECRTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECRTFGSMGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ECRTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JCDXF17.40N/A
N/A
JC Decaux SA
SGGKY63.81N/A
N/A
Singapore Technologies Engineering Ltd.
APGI0.01N/A
N/A
American Power Group Corp.
HFAHF1.09N/A
N/A
Navigator Global Invts Ltd.
TMGEF0.10N/A
-0.72%
Thermal Energy International Inc.

ECRTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ECRTF and GSMGF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECRTF and GSMGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECRTF
1D Price
Change %
ECRTF100%
-12.57%
GSMGF - ECRTF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNL - ECRTF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.76%
ONXGF - ECRTF
20%
Poorly correlated
+27.83%
EDVMF - ECRTF
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.03%
ELRRF - ECRTF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
More

GSMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GSMGF and VITFF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GSMGF and VITFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSMGF
1D Price
Change %
GSMGF100%
N/A
VITFF - GSMGF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
APRAF - GSMGF
26%
Poorly correlated
+14.52%
ECRTF - GSMGF
22%
Poorly correlated
-12.57%
CNL - GSMGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.76%
GOTRF - GSMGF
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
More