ECRAF
Price
$1.01
Change
-$0.01 (-0.98%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
252.78M
NBMFF
Price
$0.30
Change
-$0.03 (-9.09%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
37.75M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ECRAF vs NBMFF

Header iconECRAF vs NBMFF Comparison
Open Charts ECRAF vs NBMFFBanner chart's image
ECORA RESOURCES
Price$1.01
Change-$0.01 (-0.98%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization252.78M
NEO Battery Materials
Price$0.30
Change-$0.03 (-9.09%)
Volume$32.34K
Capitalization37.75M
ECRAF vs NBMFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ECRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECRAF vs. NBMFF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECRAF is a Hold and NBMFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (ECRAF: $1.01 vs. NBMFF: $0.30)
Brand notoriety: ECRAF and NBMFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECRAF: 7% vs. NBMFF: 333%
Market capitalization -- ECRAF: $252.78M vs. NBMFF: $37.75M
ECRAF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $252.78M. NBMFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $37.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECRAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNBMFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ECRAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NBMFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ECRAF is a better buy in the long-term than NBMFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECRAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NBMFF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ECRAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • NBMFF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NBMFF is a better buy in the short-term than ECRAF.

Price Growth

ECRAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +1.17% price change this week, while NBMFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +7.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.42%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.43% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECRAF($253M) has a higher market cap than NBMFF($37.8M). ECRAF YTD gains are higher at: 19.919 vs. NBMFF (-45.455). ECRAF has more cash in the bank: 7.87M vs. NBMFF (63.8K). NBMFF has less debt than ECRAF: NBMFF (156K) vs ECRAF (93.3M).
ECRAFNBMFFECRAF / NBMFF
Capitalization253M37.8M669%
EBITDAN/A-4.27M-
Gain YTD19.919-45.455-44%
P/E Ratio11.23N/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total Cash7.87M63.8K12,342%
Total Debt93.3M156K59,808%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ECRAF vs NBMFF: Fundamental Ratings
ECRAF
NBMFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10075
SMR RATING
1..100
43100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4350
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ECRAF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NBMFF (91). This means that ECRAF’s stock grew significantly faster than NBMFF’s over the last 12 months.

NBMFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as ECRAF (100). This means that NBMFF’s stock grew similarly to ECRAF’s over the last 12 months.

ECRAF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NBMFF (100). This means that ECRAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NBMFF’s over the last 12 months.

ECRAF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as NBMFF (50). This means that ECRAF’s stock grew similarly to NBMFF’s over the last 12 months.

ECRAF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NBMFF (100). This means that ECRAF’s stock grew similarly to NBMFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECRAFNBMFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
77%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ECRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SNREY60.050.21
+0.35%
Sunrise Communications AG
ILLMF1.10N/A
N/A
illumin Holdings Inc.
STRYF5.68N/A
N/A
Storytel AB
BABWF4.84N/A
N/A
International Consolidated Airlines Group SA
DOGP0.03N/A
-0.53%
Dogecoin Cash Inc.

ECRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ECRAF and NBMFF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECRAF and NBMFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECRAF
1D Price
Change %
ECRAF100%
N/A
NBMFF - ECRAF
20%
Poorly correlated
-8.34%
AMVMF - ECRAF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+5.94%
AMLM - ECRAF
-4%
Poorly correlated
-15.49%
ALTPF - ECRAF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+11.53%
AMYZF - ECRAF
-11%
Poorly correlated
+2.14%

NBMFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NBMFF and NRGYF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBMFF and NRGYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBMFF
1D Price
Change %
NBMFF100%
-8.34%
NRGYF - NBMFF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASHXF - NBMFF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ECRAF - NBMFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IIDDY - NBMFF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LBSR - NBMFF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
More