ECPG
Price
$48.83
Change
+$0.31 (+0.64%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.09B
103 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OMF
Price
$59.69
Change
-$0.75 (-1.24%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
7.03B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ECPG vs OMF

Header iconECPG vs OMF Comparison
Open Charts ECPG vs OMFBanner chart's image
Encore Capital Group
Price$48.83
Change+$0.31 (+0.64%)
Volume$181.24K
Capitalization1.09B
OneMain Holdings
Price$59.69
Change-$0.75 (-1.24%)
Volume$823.19K
Capitalization7.03B
ECPG vs OMF Comparison Chart in %
ECPG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECPG vs. OMF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECPG is a Buy and OMF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (ECPG: $48.52 vs. OMF: $60.44)
Brand notoriety: ECPG and OMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECPG: 78% vs. OMF: 58%
Market capitalization -- ECPG: $1.09B vs. OMF: $7.03B
ECPG [@Savings Banks] is valued at $1.09B. OMF’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $7.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $648.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECPG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOMF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ECPG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OMF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than ECPG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECPG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ECPG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OMF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the short-term than ECPG.

Price Growth

ECPG (@Savings Banks) experienced а +13.50% price change this week, while OMF (@Savings Banks) price change was +1.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

ECPG is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

OMF is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-0.14% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMF($7.03B) has a higher market cap than ECPG($1.09B). OMF YTD gains are higher at: 25.058 vs. ECPG (1.570). ECPG has less debt than OMF: ECPG (3.97B) vs OMF (22.3B). OMF has higher revenues than ECPG: OMF (4.87B) vs ECPG (1.47B).
ECPGOMFECPG / OMF
Capitalization1.09B7.03B15%
EBITDA266MN/A-
Gain YTD1.57025.0586%
P/E RatioN/A10.12-
Revenue1.47B4.87B30%
Total Cash173MN/A-
Total Debt3.97B22.3B18%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ECPG vs OMF: Fundamental Ratings
ECPG
OMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1713
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8523
SMR RATING
1..100
938
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4344
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
161
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMF's Valuation (18) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for ECPG (97). This means that OMF’s stock grew significantly faster than ECPG’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECPG (85). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECPG’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's SMR Rating (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for ECPG (93). This means that OMF’s stock grew significantly faster than ECPG’s over the last 12 months.

ECPG's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as OMF (44). This means that ECPG’s stock grew similarly to OMF’s over the last 12 months.

ECPG's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OMF (61). This means that ECPG’s stock grew somewhat faster than OMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECPGOMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ECPG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VAIGX23.400.10
+0.43%
Vanguard Advice Select Intl Gr Admiral
CNPEX72.750.24
+0.33%
American Funds New Perspective 529E
FLDGX15.590.04
+0.26%
Meeder Dynamic Allocation Retail
JEVRX11.230.02
+0.18%
JHancock Disciplined Value Em Mkts Eq R6
ASPYX40.08-0.37
-0.91%
Alger Spectra Y

ECPG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECPG has been loosely correlated with PRAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ECPG jumps, then PRAA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECPG
1D Price
Change %
ECPG100%
-2.39%
PRAA - ECPG
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
OMF - ECPG
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
UHAL - ECPG
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
SYF - ECPG
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.44%
BFH - ECPG
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
More

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with COF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then COF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
+1.05%
COF - OMF
84%
Closely correlated
+0.63%
AXP - OMF
83%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
SYF - OMF
82%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
BFH - OMF
79%
Closely correlated
+0.79%
ENVA - OMF
79%
Closely correlated
+1.52%
More