Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECOW vs IEMG
ECOW vs IEMG Comparison
Open Charts ECOW vs IEMG
Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF
Price$23.61
Change+$0.22 (+0.94%)
Volume$16.16K
Net Assets108.09M
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Price$62.78
Change+$0.74 (+1.19%)
Volume$9.64M
Net Assets101.58B
ECOW vs IEMG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECOW vs. IEMG commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECOW is a Hold and IEMG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IEMG has more net assets: 102B vs. ECOW (108M). ECOW has a higher annual dividend yield than IEMG: ECOW (23.820) vs IEMG (21.693). ECOW was incepted earlier than IEMG: ECOW (6 years) vs IEMG (13 years). IEMG (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than ECOW (0.70). ECOW has a higher turnover IEMG (7.00) vs IEMG (7.00).
| ECOW | IEMG | ECOW / IEMG | |
| Gain YTD | 23.820 | 21.693 | 110% |
| Net Assets | 108M | 102B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.09 | 778% |
| Turnover | 94.00 | 7.00 | 1,343% |
| Yield | 3.89 | 3.03 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ECOW | IEMG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 83% | 21 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ECOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECOW has been closely correlated with VALE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECOW jumps, then VALE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECOW | 100% | +0.91% | ||
| VALE - ECOW | 71% Closely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| JD - ECOW | 66% Closely correlated | +1.68% | ||
| BIDU - ECOW | 64% Loosely correlated | +3.82% | ||
| BABA - ECOW | 61% Loosely correlated | +3.56% | ||
| GGB - ECOW | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.90% | ||
More | ||||
IEMG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEMG has been loosely correlated with ATHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IEMG jumps, then ATHM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IEMG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEMG | 100% | +1.19% | ||
| ATHM - IEMG | 61% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| BZ - IEMG | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| IQ - IEMG | 59% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| HTHT - IEMG | 58% Loosely correlated | +3.33% | ||
| PDD - IEMG | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.65% | ||
More | ||||