Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECOAX vs VCRQX
ECOAX vs VCRQX Comparison
Open Charts ECOAX vs VCRQX
Redwheel Next Generation Power Infras A
Price$11.15
Change-$0.21 (-1.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets229.11M
NYLI CBRE Global Infrastructure Class R6
Price$14.83
Change-$0.09 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.39B
ECOAX vs VCRQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECOAX vs. VCRQX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECOAX is a Hold and VCRQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VCRQX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. ECOAX (229M). ECOAX pays higher dividends than VCRQX: ECOAX (3.43) vs VCRQX (2.09). ECOAX was incepted earlier than VCRQX: ECOAX (5 years) vs VCRQX (6 years). ECOAX (1.20) is less costly to investors than VCRQX (0.90). VCRQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. ECOAX (47.00). VCRQX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECOAX: VCRQX (0) vs ECOAX (2500). ECOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.53 vs. VCRQX (12.06). VCRQX return over 5 years is better than : 40.82 vs. ECOAX (14.99).
| ECOAX | VCRQX | ECOAX / VCRQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.90 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.90 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.077 | 16.140 | 193% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 229M | 1.39B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.43 | 2.09 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.53 | 12.06 | 237% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.34 | 29.40 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.99 | 40.82 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement