Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECOAX vs VCRQX
ECOAX vs VCRQX Comparison
Open Charts ECOAX vs VCRQX
Redwheel Next Generation Power Infras A
Price$11.04
Change-$0.21 (-1.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets224.45M
NYLI CBRE Global Infrastructure Class R6
Price$15.33
Change+$0.40 (+2.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.53B
ECOAX vs VCRQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECOAX vs. VCRQX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECOAX is a Hold and VCRQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VCRQX has more cash in the bank: 1.53B vs. ECOAX (224M). ECOAX pays higher dividends than VCRQX: ECOAX (3.61) vs VCRQX (1.98). ECOAX was incepted earlier than VCRQX: ECOAX (5 years) vs VCRQX (6 years). ECOAX (1.20) is less costly to investors than VCRQX (0.90). VCRQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. ECOAX (47.00). VCRQX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECOAX: VCRQX (0) vs ECOAX (2500). ECOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.35 vs. VCRQX (18.61). VCRQX return over 5 years is better than : 42.69 vs. ECOAX (-4.22).
| ECOAX | VCRQX | ECOAX / VCRQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.90 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.90 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.151 | 3.581 | 116% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 224M | 1.53B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.61 | 1.98 | 182% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.35 | 18.61 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.63 | 30.13 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.22 | 42.69 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers