Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECOAX vs VCRQX
ECOAX vs VCRQX Comparison
Open Charts ECOAX vs VCRQX
Redwheel Next Generation Power Infras A
Price$10.73
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets218.42M
NYLI CBRE Global Infrastructure Class R6
Price$14.81
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.44B
ECOAX vs VCRQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECOAX vs. VCRQX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECOAX is a Hold and VCRQX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VCRQX has more cash in the bank: 1.45B vs. ECOAX (218M). ECOAX pays higher dividends than VCRQX: ECOAX (3.53) vs VCRQX (2.04). ECOAX was incepted earlier than VCRQX: ECOAX (5 years) vs VCRQX (6 years). ECOAX (1.20) is less costly to investors than VCRQX (0.90). VCRQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. ECOAX (47.00). VCRQX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECOAX: VCRQX (0) vs ECOAX (2500). ECOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.48 vs. VCRQX (14.93). VCRQX return over 5 years is better than : 40.98 vs. ECOAX (-1.03).
| ECOAX | VCRQX | ECOAX / VCRQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.90 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.90 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.808 | 15.284 | 156% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218M | 1.45B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.53 | 2.04 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.48 | 14.93 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.93 | 28.07 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.03 | 40.98 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement