Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECOAX vs VCRCX
ECOAX vs VCRCX Comparison
Open Charts ECOAX vs VCRCX
Redwheel Next Generation Power Infras A
Price$11.04
Change-$0.21 (-1.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets224.45M
NYLI CBRE Global Infrastructure
Price$15.23
Change+$0.38 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.53B
ECOAX vs VCRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECOAX vs. VCRCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECOAX is a Hold and VCRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VCRCX has more cash in the bank: 1.53B vs. ECOAX (224M). ECOAX pays higher dividends than VCRCX: ECOAX (3.61) vs VCRCX (0.89). ECOAX was incepted earlier than VCRCX: ECOAX (5 years) vs VCRCX (7 years). VCRCX (2.08) is less costly to investors than ECOAX (1.20). VCRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. ECOAX (47.00). VCRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECOAX: VCRCX (1000) vs ECOAX (2500). ECOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.35 vs. VCRCX (17.19). VCRCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.57 vs. ECOAX (-4.22).
| ECOAX | VCRCX | ECOAX / VCRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 2.08 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 2.08 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.151 | 3.394 | 122% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 224M | 1.53B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.61 | 0.89 | 406% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.35 | 17.19 | 194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.63 | 25.60 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.22 | 34.57 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement