ECO
Price
$21.96
Change
-$0.48 (-2.14%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
721.43M
80 days until earnings call
NAT
Price
$2.63
Change
+$0.01 (+0.38%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
549.13M
2 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ECO vs NAT

Header iconECO vs NAT Comparison
Open Charts ECO vs NATBanner chart's image
Okeanis Eco Tankers
Price$21.96
Change-$0.48 (-2.14%)
Volume$685.43K
Capitalization721.43M
Nordic American Tanker
Price$2.63
Change+$0.01 (+0.38%)
Volume$2.91M
Capitalization549.13M
ECO vs NAT Comparison Chart
Loading...
ECO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECO vs. NAT commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECO is a Hold and NAT is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (ECO: $24.46 vs. NAT: $2.66)
Brand notoriety: ECO: Not notable vs. NAT: Notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECO: 54% vs. NAT: 77%
Market capitalization -- ECO: $721.43M vs. NAT: $549.13M
ECO [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $721.43M. NAT’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $549.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $29.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNAT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ECO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ECO is a better buy in the long-term than NAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ECO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ECO and NAT are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ECO (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +0.49% price change this week, while NAT (@Marine Shipping) price change was -1.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

ECO is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

NAT is expected to report earnings on May 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-0.93% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECO($721M) has a higher market cap than NAT($549M). NAT has higher P/E ratio than ECO: NAT (8.77) vs ECO (6.50). ECO YTD gains are higher at: 15.052 vs. NAT (6.400). ECO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 215M vs. NAT (92.4M). ECO has more cash in the bank: 49.1M vs. NAT (40.5M). NAT has less debt than ECO: NAT (278M) vs ECO (657M). ECO has higher revenues than NAT: ECO (400M) vs NAT (367M).
ECONATECO / NAT
Capitalization721M549M131%
EBITDA215M92.4M233%
Gain YTD15.0526.400235%
P/E Ratio6.508.7774%
Revenue400M367M109%
Total Cash49.1M40.5M121%
Total Debt657M278M236%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NAT: Fundamental Ratings
NAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
62
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECONAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
47%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
58%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ECO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

ECO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECO has been closely correlated with NAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECO jumps, then NAT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECO
1D Price
Change %
ECO100%
+0.49%
NAT - ECO
67%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
HAFN - ECO
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
ASC - ECO
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
SFL - ECO
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.86%
BWLP - ECO
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.76%
More

NAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NAT has been closely correlated with ECO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NAT jumps, then ECO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAT
1D Price
Change %
NAT100%
+0.76%
ECO - NAT
67%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
ASC - NAT
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
HAFN - NAT
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
SFL - NAT
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.86%
CMRE - NAT
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
More