ECO
Price
$39.00
Change
+$3.14 (+8.76%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.24B
105 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NAT
Price
$3.70
Change
+$0.03 (+0.82%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
783.48M
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ECO vs NAT

Header iconECO vs NAT Comparison
Open Charts ECO vs NATBanner chart's image
Okeanis Eco Tankers
Price$39.00
Change+$3.14 (+8.76%)
Volume$718.2K
Capitalization1.24B
Nordic American Tanker
Price$3.70
Change+$0.03 (+0.82%)
Volume$2.21M
Capitalization783.48M
ECO vs NAT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECO vs. NAT commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECO is a Buy and NAT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (ECO: $39.00 vs. NAT: $3.70)
Brand notoriety: ECO: Not notable vs. NAT: Notable
ECO represents the Marine Shipping, while NAT is part of the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECO: 419% vs. NAT: 83%
Market capitalization -- ECO: $1.24B vs. NAT: $783.48M
ECO [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $1.24B. NAT’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $783.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $32.81B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $105.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.89B. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $12.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECO’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNAT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ECO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ECO is a better buy in the long-term than NAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ECO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ECO and NAT are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ECO (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +16.21% price change this week, while NAT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +3.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +1.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.43%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

ECO is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2026.

NAT is expected to report earnings on Nov 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+1.42% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+0.81% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECO($1.24B) has a higher market cap than NAT($783M). NAT has higher P/E ratio than ECO: NAT (52.86) vs ECO (16.39). ECO YTD gains are higher at: 94.089 vs. NAT (59.176). ECO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 155M vs. NAT (43.9M). NAT has less debt than ECO: NAT (340M) vs ECO (631M). ECO has higher revenues than NAT: ECO (344M) vs NAT (301M).
ECONATECO / NAT
Capitalization1.24B783M158%
EBITDA155M43.9M353%
Gain YTD94.08959.176159%
P/E Ratio16.3952.8631%
Revenue344M301M114%
Total Cash59.8MN/A-
Total Debt631M340M186%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NAT: Fundamental Ratings
NAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
25
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
56
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
19

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECONAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ECO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IOEZX17.26-0.14
-0.80%
ICON Equity Income Institutional
FBSIX38.10-0.42
-1.09%
Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value R6
TEPLX31.67-0.47
-1.46%
Templeton Growth A
PCVCX9.42-0.16
-1.67%
Virtus NFJ Small-Cap Value C
LSSIX29.52-0.79
-2.61%
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Instl

ECO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECO has been closely correlated with NAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECO jumps, then NAT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECO
1D Price
Change %
ECO100%
+8.76%
NAT - ECO
73%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
HAFN - ECO
70%
Closely correlated
-0.16%
ASC - ECO
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
NMM - ECO
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.23%
BWLP - ECO
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.62%
More

NAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NAT has been closely correlated with DHT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NAT jumps, then DHT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAT
1D Price
Change %
NAT100%
+1.10%
DHT - NAT
81%
Closely correlated
+1.72%
TNK - NAT
79%
Closely correlated
+1.69%
TEN - NAT
77%
Closely correlated
+1.77%
INSW - NAT
77%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
FRO - NAT
75%
Closely correlated
+3.24%
More