ECO
Price
$40.36
Change
-$0.14 (-0.35%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.44B
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HAFN
Price
$5.98
Change
+$0.07 (+1.18%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
2.99B
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ECO vs HAFN

Header iconECO vs HAFN Comparison
Open Charts ECO vs HAFNBanner chart's image
Okeanis Eco Tankers
Price$40.36
Change-$0.14 (-0.35%)
Volume$560.3K
Capitalization1.44B
Hafnia
Price$5.98
Change+$0.07 (+1.18%)
Volume$1.55M
Capitalization2.99B
ECO vs HAFN Comparison Chart in %
ECO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HAFN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECO vs. HAFN commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECO is a Hold and HAFN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (ECO: $40.36 vs. HAFN: $5.98)
Brand notoriety: ECO and HAFN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECO: 173% vs. HAFN: 136%
Market capitalization -- ECO: $1.44B vs. HAFN: $2.99B
ECO [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $1.44B. HAFN’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $2.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $35.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $5.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECO’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHAFN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ECO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HAFN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ECO is a better buy in the long-term than HAFN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAFN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ECO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HAFN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ECO and HAFN are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ECO (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +10.88% price change this week, while HAFN (@Marine Shipping) price change was +5.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

ECO is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

HAFN is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+0.91% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAFN($2.99B) has a higher market cap than ECO($1.44B). ECO has higher P/E ratio than HAFN: ECO (16.96) vs HAFN (9.80). ECO YTD gains are higher at: 19.267 vs. HAFN (12.195). HAFN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 570M vs. ECO (161M). HAFN has more cash in the bank: 132M vs. ECO (52.6M). ECO has less debt than HAFN: ECO (617M) vs HAFN (895M). HAFN has higher revenues than ECO: HAFN (2.22B) vs ECO (350M).
ECOHAFNECO / HAFN
Capitalization1.44B2.99B48%
EBITDA161M570M28%
Gain YTD19.26712.195158%
P/E Ratio16.969.80173%
Revenue350M2.22B16%
Total Cash52.6M132M40%
Total Debt617M895M69%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECOHAFN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ECO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HAFN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RDWBX14.390.04
+0.28%
American Funds Dvlpg Wld Gr&Inc R2
GSAFX29.220.02
+0.07%
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
OISGX15.90-0.06
-0.38%
Optimum Small-Mid Cap Growth Instl
SFECX25.67-0.20
-0.77%
NAA Large Core C
PBLAX39.93-0.43
-1.07%
Principal Blue Chip A

ECO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECO has been closely correlated with NAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECO jumps, then NAT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECO
1D Price
Change %
ECO100%
-0.35%
NAT - ECO
73%
Closely correlated
N/A
HAFN - ECO
71%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
ASC - ECO
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
NMM - ECO
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.89%
BWLP - ECO
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
More

HAFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAFN has been closely correlated with ASC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAFN jumps, then ASC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAFN
1D Price
Change %
HAFN100%
+1.18%
ASC - HAFN
72%
Closely correlated
-0.58%
NAT - HAFN
63%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NMM - HAFN
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.89%
BWLP - HAFN
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
GNK - HAFN
50%
Loosely correlated
+3.00%
More