ECNCF
Price
$1.97
Change
+$0.02 (+1.03%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
485.79M
ELEEF
Price
$24.61
Change
-$0.19 (-0.77%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
6.36B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ECNCF vs ELEEF

Header iconECNCF vs ELEEF Comparison
Open Charts ECNCF vs ELEEFBanner chart's image
ECN Capital
Price$1.97
Change+$0.02 (+1.03%)
Volume$53.9K
Capitalization485.79M
Element Fleet Mgmt
Price$24.61
Change-$0.19 (-0.77%)
Volume$32.73K
Capitalization6.36B
ECNCF vs ELEEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ECNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ELEEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECNCF vs. ELEEF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECNCF is a Hold and ELEEF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (ECNCF: $1.97 vs. ELEEF: $24.60)
Brand notoriety: ECNCF and ELEEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECNCF: 174% vs. ELEEF: 45%
Market capitalization -- ECNCF: $485.79M vs. ELEEF: $6.36B
ECNCF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $485.79M. ELEEF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $6.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECNCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileELEEF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ECNCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ELEEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ELEEF is a better buy in the long-term than ECNCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECNCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ELEEF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ECNCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ELEEF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ELEEF is a better buy in the short-term than ECNCF.

Price Growth

ECNCF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +1.03% price change this week, while ELEEF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +1.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +3.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+3.75% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ELEEF($6.36B) has a higher market cap than ECNCF($486M). ECNCF has higher P/E ratio than ELEEF: ECNCF (212.77) vs ELEEF (20.06). ELEEF YTD gains are higher at: 21.386 vs. ECNCF (-10.855). ELEEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.07B vs. ECNCF (30.7M). ELEEF has more cash in the bank: 70.6M vs. ECNCF (22.5M). ECNCF has less debt than ELEEF: ECNCF (1.05B) vs ELEEF (8.38B). ELEEF has higher revenues than ECNCF: ELEEF (1.76B) vs ECNCF (208M).
ECNCFELEEFECNCF / ELEEF
Capitalization486M6.36B8%
EBITDA30.7M1.07B3%
Gain YTD-10.85521.386-51%
P/E Ratio212.7720.061,061%
Revenue208M1.76B12%
Total Cash22.5M70.6M32%
Total Debt1.05B8.38B13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ECNCF vs ELEEF: Fundamental Ratings
ECNCF
ELEEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1003
SMR RATING
1..100
4956
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4943
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9324
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ELEEF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECNCF (93). This means that ELEEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECNCF’s over the last 12 months.

ELEEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ECNCF (100). This means that ELEEF’s stock grew significantly faster than ECNCF’s over the last 12 months.

ECNCF's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as ELEEF (56). This means that ECNCF’s stock grew similarly to ELEEF’s over the last 12 months.

ELEEF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as ECNCF (49). This means that ELEEF’s stock grew similarly to ECNCF’s over the last 12 months.

ELEEF's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ECNCF (93). This means that ELEEF’s stock grew significantly faster than ECNCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECNCFELEEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ECNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ELEEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSHOX118.641.21
+1.03%
Fidelity Select Construction & Housing
BRGIX111.581.00
+0.90%
Bridges Investment Fund
TEDIX31.570.22
+0.70%
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery A
APHRX34.890.21
+0.61%
Artisan Global Opportunities Instl
SOCUX21.400.04
+0.19%
Spirit of America Utilities C

ECNCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ECNCF and HRI have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECNCF and HRI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECNCF
1D Price
Change %
ECNCF100%
N/A
HRI - ECNCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
EHMEF - ECNCF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDNMF - ECNCF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELEEF - ECNCF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
DWIS - ECNCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-12.50%
More

ELEEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ELEEF and CSASF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ELEEF and CSASF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELEEF
1D Price
Change %
ELEEF100%
-0.75%
CSASF - ELEEF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCMGF - ELEEF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
DWIS - ELEEF
12%
Poorly correlated
-12.50%
EHMEF - ELEEF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDNMY - ELEEF
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.90%
More