Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECML vs IJS
ECML vs IJS Comparison
Open Charts ECML vs IJS
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF
Price$35.42
Change+$0.06 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.45M
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
Price$120.73
Change+$0.87 (+0.73%)
Volume$160.59K
Net Assets7.44B
ECML vs IJS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECML vs. IJS commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECML is a Hold and IJS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IJS has more net assets: 7.44B vs. ECML (138M). IJS has a higher annual dividend yield than ECML: IJS (6.164) vs ECML (3.036). ECML was incepted earlier than IJS: ECML (3 years) vs IJS (25 years). IJS (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than ECML (0.95). IJS has a higher turnover ECML (30.00) vs ECML (30.00).
| ECML | IJS | ECML / IJS | |
| Gain YTD | 3.036 | 6.164 | 49% |
| Net Assets | 138M | 7.44B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.18 | 528% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 52.00 | 58% |
| Yield | 1.38 | 1.62 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ECML | IJS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | 7 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
ECML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECML has been loosely correlated with MLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ECML jumps, then MLI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECML | 100% | N/A | ||
| MLI - ECML | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.03% | ||
| OC - ECML | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.10% | ||
| TEX - ECML | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| BCC - ECML | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| BXC - ECML | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.61% | ||
More | ||||
IJS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IJS has been closely correlated with SBCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IJS jumps, then SBCF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IJS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IJS | 100% | +0.73% | ||
| SBCF - IJS | 84% Closely correlated | +1.45% | ||
| UCB - IJS | 84% Closely correlated | +2.80% | ||
| SFBS - IJS | 84% Closely correlated | +1.94% | ||
| ABCB - IJS | 84% Closely correlated | +1.88% | ||
| SFNC - IJS | 83% Closely correlated | +1.60% | ||
More | ||||