Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECML vs IJJ
ECML vs IJJ Comparison
Open Charts ECML vs IJJ
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF
Price$30.76
Change-$1.00 (-3.15%)
Volume$309
Net Assets145.32M
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
Price$126.61
Change-$0.16 (-0.13%)
Volume$73.52K
Net Assets7.83B
ECML vs IJJ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECML vs. IJJ commentary
Jul 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECML is a Hold and IJJ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IJJ has more net assets: 7.83B vs. ECML (145M). IJJ has a higher annual dividend yield than ECML: IJJ (2.134) vs ECML (-2.955). ECML was incepted earlier than IJJ: ECML (2 years) vs IJJ (25 years). IJJ (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than ECML (0.95). IJJ has a higher turnover ECML (30.00) vs ECML (30.00).
| ECML | IJJ | ECML / IJJ | |
| Gain YTD | -2.955 | 2.134 | -138% |
| Net Assets | 145M | 7.83B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.18 | 528% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 40.00 | 75% |
| Yield | 1.00 | 1.90 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ECML | IJJ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ECML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECML has been closely correlated with TPH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECML jumps, then TPH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECML | 100% | -3.17% | ||
| TPH - ECML | 75% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| BCC - ECML | 75% Closely correlated | -3.26% | ||
| TEX - ECML | 69% Closely correlated | -2.41% | ||
| AN - ECML | 68% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| MHO - ECML | 67% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
More | ||||
IJJ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IJJ has been closely correlated with HOMB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IJJ jumps, then HOMB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IJJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IJJ | 100% | -0.13% | ||
| HOMB - IJJ | 82% Closely correlated | +3.64% | ||
| EQH - IJJ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| GGG - IJJ | 78% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| ITT - IJJ | 76% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| SEIC - IJJ | 76% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||