ECLMF
Price
$0.14
Change
+$0.08 (+133.33%)
Updated
Apr 23 closing price
Capitalization
26.31M
TMRAF
Price
$15.39
Change
+$0.44 (+2.94%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
4.52B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ECLMF vs TMRAF

Header iconECLMF vs TMRAF Comparison
Open Charts ECLMF vs TMRAFBanner chart's image
Ecolomondo
Price$0.14
Change+$0.08 (+133.33%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization26.31M
Tomra Systems A/S/A
Price$15.39
Change+$0.44 (+2.94%)
Volume$248
Capitalization4.52B
ECLMF vs TMRAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ECLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECLMF vs. TMRAF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECLMF is a Hold and TMRAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (ECLMF: $0.14 vs. TMRAF: $15.39)
Brand notoriety: ECLMF and TMRAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECLMF: 100% vs. TMRAF: 22%
Market capitalization -- ECLMF: $26.31M vs. TMRAF: $4.52B
ECLMF [@Environmental Services] is valued at $26.31M. TMRAF’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $4.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECLMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTMRAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ECLMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TMRAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TMRAF is a better buy in the long-term than ECLMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECLMF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMRAF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ECLMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • TMRAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TMRAF is a better buy in the short-term than ECLMF.

Price Growth

ECLMF (@Environmental Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TMRAF (@Environmental Services) price change was -1.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.98%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (-1.64% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMRAF($4.52B) has a higher market cap than ECLMF($26.3M). ECLMF YTD gains are higher at: 139.316 vs. TMRAF (20.034). TMRAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.6B vs. ECLMF (-447.83K). TMRAF has more cash in the bank: 642M vs. ECLMF (32.9K). ECLMF has less debt than TMRAF: ECLMF (35.7M) vs TMRAF (4.42B). TMRAF has higher revenues than ECLMF: TMRAF (13.8B) vs ECLMF (39.5K).
ECLMFTMRAFECLMF / TMRAF
Capitalization26.3M4.52B1%
EBITDA-447.83K2.6B-0%
Gain YTD139.31620.034695%
P/E RatioN/A43.67-
Revenue39.5K13.8B0%
Total Cash32.9K642M0%
Total Debt35.7M4.42B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ECLMF vs TMRAF: Fundamental Ratings
ECLMF
TMRAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10050
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3649
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10093
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TMRAF's Valuation (82) in the null industry is in the same range as ECLMF (92). This means that TMRAF’s stock grew similarly to ECLMF’s over the last 12 months.

TMRAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ECLMF (100). This means that TMRAF’s stock grew similarly to ECLMF’s over the last 12 months.

TMRAF's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECLMF (100). This means that TMRAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECLMF’s over the last 12 months.

ECLMF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as TMRAF (49). This means that ECLMF’s stock grew similarly to TMRAF’s over the last 12 months.

TMRAF's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as ECLMF (100). This means that TMRAF’s stock grew similarly to ECLMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECLMFTMRAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ECLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CVRT32.350.27
+0.83%
Calamos Convertible Equity Alt ETF
RVER31.660.20
+0.64%
Trenchless Fund ETF
MICFF5.23N/A
N/A
Mint Income Fund
MMIN23.15-0.03
-0.11%
NYLI MacKay Muni Insured ETF
EWA26.48-0.06
-0.23%
iShares MSCI Australia ETF

ECLMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ECLMF and SNRG have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECLMF and SNRG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECLMF
1D Price
Change %
ECLMF100%
N/A
SNRG - ECLMF
13%
Poorly correlated
+17.28%
TMRAF - ECLMF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SECYF - ECLMF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
SCPJ - ECLMF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EAATF - ECLMF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TMRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TMRAF and VEOEY have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TMRAF and VEOEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMRAF
1D Price
Change %
TMRAF100%
N/A
VEOEY - TMRAF
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
VEOEF - TMRAF
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
ECLMF - TMRAF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMRAY - TMRAF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SECYF - TMRAF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
More