ECLMF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.01 (-7.69%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Capitalization
32.64M
SECYF
Price
$14.14
Change
+$0.07 (+0.50%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.1B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ECLMF vs SECYF

Header iconECLMF vs SECYF Comparison
Open Charts ECLMF vs SECYFBanner chart's image
Ecolomondo
Price$0.12
Change-$0.01 (-7.69%)
Volume$20K
Capitalization32.64M
SECURE WASTE INFRASTRUCTURE
Price$14.14
Change+$0.07 (+0.50%)
Volume$62.08K
Capitalization3.1B
ECLMF vs SECYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ECLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SECYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECLMF vs. SECYF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECLMF is a Hold and SECYF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (ECLMF: $0.12 vs. SECYF: $14.14)
Brand notoriety: ECLMF and SECYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECLMF: 176% vs. SECYF: 109%
Market capitalization -- ECLMF: $32.64M vs. SECYF: $3.1B
ECLMF [@Environmental Services] is valued at $32.64M. SECYF’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $3.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $88.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECLMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSECYF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ECLMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SECYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SECYF is a better buy in the long-term than ECLMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECLMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SECYF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ECLMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SECYF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SECYF is a better buy in the short-term than ECLMF.

Price Growth

ECLMF (@Environmental Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SECYF (@Environmental Services) price change was +8.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +1.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+1.61% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SECYF($3.1B) has a higher market cap than ECLMF($32.6M). ECLMF YTD gains are higher at: 105.128 vs. SECYF (25.299). SECYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 428M vs. ECLMF (-185.68K). SECYF has more cash in the bank: 31M vs. ECLMF (227K). ECLMF has less debt than SECYF: ECLMF (44.7M) vs SECYF (1.01B). SECYF has higher revenues than ECLMF: SECYF (10.3B) vs ECLMF (833K).
ECLMFSECYFECLMF / SECYF
Capitalization32.6M3.1B1%
EBITDA-185.68K428M-0%
Gain YTD105.12825.299416%
P/E RatioN/A21.59-
Revenue833K10.3B0%
Total Cash227K31M1%
Total Debt44.7M1.01B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ECLMF vs SECYF: Fundamental Ratings
ECLMF
SECYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1007
SMR RATING
1..100
9943
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5540
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1004
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SECYF's Valuation (57) in the null industry is in the same range as ECLMF (82). This means that SECYF’s stock grew similarly to ECLMF’s over the last 12 months.

SECYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ECLMF (100). This means that SECYF’s stock grew significantly faster than ECLMF’s over the last 12 months.

SECYF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECLMF (99). This means that SECYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECLMF’s over the last 12 months.

SECYF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as ECLMF (55). This means that SECYF’s stock grew similarly to ECLMF’s over the last 12 months.

SECYF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ECLMF (100). This means that SECYF’s stock grew significantly faster than ECLMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECLMFSECYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ECLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SECYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AWLIF0.200.02
+9.89%
AMERIWEST CRITICAL METALS INC.
MJDLF8.370.12
+1.49%
Major Drilling Group International Inc.
GBERY73.350.58
+0.80%
Geberit AG
DFILF1.99N/A
N/A
DFI Retail Group Holdings Ltd.
CNNEF1.78N/A
-0.11%
Canacol Energy Ltd.

ECLMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ECLMF and SNRG have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECLMF and SNRG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECLMF
1D Price
Change %
ECLMF100%
N/A
SNRG - ECLMF
13%
Poorly correlated
-19.26%
TMRAF - ECLMF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SECYF - ECLMF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
SCPJ - ECLMF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EAATF - ECLMF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SECYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SECYF and ECLMF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SECYF and ECLMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SECYF
1D Price
Change %
SECYF100%
+0.50%
ECLMF - SECYF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMRAF - SECYF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCPJ - SECYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCEI - SECYF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+8.65%
EAATF - SECYF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More